![Ads... [1259x1278 - 109KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/3zFoIc.jpg){kind=link}
He pushed their #1 money maker.
Significantly incompetent enemy action is indistinguishable from ally aid.
He's basically forced them to accelerate their plans and hurt them in the process.
Fucked up the "two steps forward, one step back" model of slow-walking totalitarianism that is the DNC+GOP.
Explains why they wanted him out so bad.
Come to think of it, that would be my second plan to fuck up the occupation if I were president.
My first plan as president to take down the occupation would be to take a stealth trip down to NAB coronado or Fort Benning, recruit as many special forces guys as possible in one-on-one meetings, set up a huge session of congress and the senate, and then arrest all of them on the spot using the military.
Basically a dictatorship.
Mass arrested would likely include the entire staffs of all the major banks, both federal and non-federal, news agencies/media, social media companies, wallstreet, and pharmaceutical companies.
Initiate arrests of governorships, and heads of DNC and RNC, in order to immediately splinter and balkanize the u.s.
And then, from the shitshow that follows, to the spoils go the victor.
Would give americans the last best chance possible.
You know, you don't fill your user name very well.
Very hopeful and positive outlook.
As far as I'm concerned he is doing exactly what they said they needed him for. Did you see that clip with the kike banker talking about how they decided to bail him out so they could use him as they saw fit?
Many say lots of people lost their lives in 911, but I also see many saying hardly anyone died in the buildings. I don't know as I haven't looked beyond seeing the hand rubbing insurance policy and the forgotten building related to California and Clintons.
You know, you don't fill your user name very well.
First, start by assuming everything, especially anything that helps us, is actually enemy action is disguise.
Purely pragmatism.
Any positivity is pragmatic or coincidental.
As far as I'm concerned he is doing exactly what they said they needed him for.
Regardless, if it were not true, the internationalist set would still claim this. The status of his loyalty is irrelevant, because you never assume anyone is fully on our side. And then you work things so that if they're not, it doesn't change much on your end. Thats security 101. People fail, people turncoat. People infiltrate, and people have divided loyalty. Thats ancillary, because all these things should be accounted for from the beginning, and managed so that the net outcome works in our favor.
And when we go beyond needing allies, go beyond needing supporters, to learning to benefit from opposition action, then and only then will we be on the path to victory.
Its not sufficient to fight an enemy. Really winning means making them work for you, making them defeat themselves without needing to drag out a fight.
And of course sometimes you don't need any of this.
Sometimes you just gotta have balls.
(post is archived)