Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

798

Scott adams posed this question, and it is basically that either this treatment is a vaccine, or the vaccines are a treatment; they can't have it both ways.

Scott adams posed this question, and it is basically that either this treatment is a vaccine, or the vaccines are a treatment; they can't have it both ways.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (3).
[–] • 0 pt

Regardless of the mechanism of the spike proteins (either direct injection or produced your body), or direct injection anti-bodies, if the pharma companies are being truthful (big "if") then the stats are about the same.

[–] • 0 pt

It's about antibodies, not spike proteins. Antibodies is the stuff that binds to spike proteins. That has two effects: Antibodies can block the part of the spike proteins that binds with cells, then they are "neutralizing" antibodies - the best of the best. But even the antibodies that bind elsewhere are valuable: They mark the spike protein so that immune system cells can find and destroy them (they act as target painters). Natural infection creates more neutralizing antibodies than vaccination. Monoclonal antibodies are neutralizing.