So if Roe v. Wade gets overturned, do we lose the "my body, my choice" defense for the (((vaxx))) and other forced/mandated bodily intrusions?

[–] • 4 pts

Nonsense. Abortion is killing another person. Forced vaxx is against the Constitution and several Amendments.

link

[–] • 3 pts

Obviously. But the "my body my choice" mantra has been kiked into synonymity with abortion in the mind of the degenerate. So in their eyes, if they have to give up "their choice" to avoid killing another person, they're going to see a perfect parallel with forced injection to "protect the at-risk".

It's obviously an evil, twisted, Talmudic way to view it. But that's how it will be perceived. And their fervor in support of forcing vaccination will be greatly enhanced if it's fueled in part by the loss of one of their most precious "~~rites~~ rights".

parent
link

[–] • 0 pt

First, they can not Prove there is a virus and they can not prove the Vaxx prevents any infection. Second and most importantly, the unborn does not fight back when assaulted. WE do.

parent
link

[–] • 1 pt

We're on the same page. I'm telling you how it's going to be presented by the media and therefore what's going to be believed by a huge portion of the population.

parent
link

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

do we lose the "my body, my choice" defense for the (((vaxx))) and other forced/mandated bodily intrusions?

Who do you think gives you that defense? Killing an unborn baby is not the same thing as refusing an experimental RNA therapy.

link

[–] • 0 pt

It isn't the same thing, but when has the (((law))) ever worked in our favor when it comes to that? It's a (((trick))) to get us to give up our defense in order to stop the culling of nigglets.

parent
link

[–] • 1 pt

now that you mention it it is very curious timing

link

[–] • 2 pts

Isn't it? I mean why would the (((SCOTUS))) all of a sudden decide that this needs to be revisited and that it may be unconstitutional when they supported it for decades? This is a perfect tool to get conservative types to willingly fight to have bodily autonomy removed. It's a (((trick))). I'm certain of that.

parent
link

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

Yeah, I'm thinking the same thing. They are going to argue for the good of the collective the government has authority over your body after they invalidate the ruling.