Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] • 8 pts

The problem currently is that the liberals are destroying the meritocracy. This is going to cripple the economy and lower the quality of life for everyone. We already see it happening. Niggers, brown people, illegals, street-shitters, women, faggots, lesbians, communists, criminals, are all getting preferential treatment at the expense of competent white Christian men.

[–] • 5 pts

That should read:

Meritocracy provides the level playing field that makes it obvious human speciation exists and that at least 7 different human species co-habit this planet. Under meritocracy we get to examine each species strengths and weaknesses at maximum resolution and observe that all anti-meritocractic systems are a version of female social wiring trying to save blacks and non whites from being non-white.

That is really what is going on. Meritocracy shows us the true ugliness of each of the 7 species and white womens wiring forces them to try to save niggers and shitskins from not being white.

Enforce meritocracy, take control over womens capacity to engage their social safety wiring in all ways except for their own kind and you solve basically most of these problems.

[–] • 2 pts
[–] • 3 pts

Blacks are content to live in mud huts and grass skirts.

Jews are the driving force behind the elimination of not just meritocracy but all the rules, standards, and customs of White society. Their purpose is not enter or take over our Civilization but to totally destroy it so they can rule over all the wealth and people of the Earth.

“Goyim were born only to serve us. Without that, they have no place in the world – only to serve the People of Israel...Why are gentiles needed? They will work, they will plow, they will reap. We will sit like an effendi and eat. That is why gentiles were created,” - Rabbi Ovadia Yosef, head of Shas’s Council of Torah Sages and a senior Sephardi adjudicator

[–] • 1 pt

A scathing, simple and accurate statement.

[–] • 1 pt

"Black underachievement spans 4 continents and is unrelated to racism."

Damn...he ain't holdin' back.

What's funny: conscientiousness is the strongest predictor of success, not IQ.

Soooo....

(I'm hoping someone can read between the lines and finish the thought to see what I'm talking about)

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

The problem with meritocracy is those who are sorely lacking in merit, those with an overabundance of it, and those who insist in denying the reality, however obvious, of the differences between between two.

The denial of natural talent on the right just insists that the differences come down to culture and effort, despite that not being true.

The left blames a conspiracy of the upper classes to preserve ones inherited wealth and status by oppressing those below them, along with a conspiracy of the White race to preserve their inherited privileges by oppressing other races.

Both are wrong, but cannot bring themselves to see the truth, that all men are not created equal, nor are all groups of men equal to one another.

Natural genetic talent must be made forefront in our discussions of inequality, genetics gives us the advantage of being able to identify which specific genes lead to success, and refute this insanity of blaming the environment for the results of inherent differences, both among individuals and groups.

[–] • 0 pt

It's also important to acknowledge that genes which lead to success vary over time. 200 years ago the genes which lead to a median IQ of 100 chewed up an awful lot of pressure resources and did jack all to extend median Caucasian lifespans in Africa beyond 18 months. The brain is incredibly resource intensive. Meanwhile, the genes which lead to a median IQ of <80 survived pretty darn well in Africa. Those extra IQ points weren't effective in a resource and disease rich environment.

Genes adapt to environmental pressures. They also adapt slowly, and the modern era of technology where IQ is king is only an eyeblink old in the grand scheme of human history.

[–] • 0 pt

IQ matters. IQ 130 black person from a nuclear family? They're likely to kick ass and take names. The same as an IQ 130 Asian person from a nuclear family.

IQ 80 person? Going to be a shitshow. One race having a greater proportion of IQ 80 tards is no more racism than Asians being short is "raciss".

[–] • 0 pt

i'd agree if he stated it appropriately , which is "black inferiority" not "underachievement"

[–] • 0 pt

Wrong, there are 7 continents.