Bias and reliability are different. Snopes is left but reliable. Huffpo is left-center and unreliable. "Fact check" is a verb for a thing editors and researchers do for reporters.... did you mean factcheck.org? or politifact? both are neutral and reliable.
But no, I told you you could find a right-wing reliable source. Wall Street Journal, Fox News, National Review, The Economist
Hint: if you can't find what you're looking for.......................................................... it's because it doesn't exist
>Snopes is left but reliable
LOL
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/apr/29/the-unreliable-facts-of-a-fact-checking-site/
The “fact check” site is useful when vetting a news story that favors a progressive take. If even the left-leaning Snopes finds it false or mostly false, that’s pretty persuasive. But not so much when it comes to something involving conservatives or conservative causes.
This past week, Snopes jumped the shark. In a post about California Assembly Bill 2943, a frightening piece of pure-grade totalitarianism, Snopes belittled a conservative opponent and misrepresented the legislation.
So much for reliability!
Washington Times is an unreliable source, lol.....I literally gave you four right-wing choices to use to find this shattering evidence of voter fraud you say exists
you haven't given me a single source
Snopes, that partisan piece of crap run by those people.... https://media.npr.org/assets/news/2010/03/20/snopes_wide-882a6c83a5b88cbed74d328a73a2365f67f7075b.jpg
LOL!
You know, that story about blows and hookers... Oh yeah... Snope, the last bastion of journalistic integrity!
What happened to the cat?
(post is archived)