WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

harlot

Slow down dude. You're attacking a White female for wearing jeans. Oh fucking no, not jeans!!!

[–] 1 pt

By 1880s’ standards, she’d be imprisoned for wearing men’s clothing. I was making an exaggeration based on the joke premise of “1980” being “pre” jewish control (since if this moron actually thinks jews haven’t controlled the entire west since 1915, he has another thing coming).

Personally, yes, women need to wear more dresses. Sick of seeing them in men’s clothes, myself. If the fashion industry wasn’t entirely run by flaming queers and jewish financiers, I would’ve gone into designing clothes instead of, well, what I design now. Making clothing useful, comfortable, and tasteful is a lost art.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

imprisoned

You are not thinking logically. That would not be a thing. Maybe in the 1500s in London. Maybe in the late 1600s around the time of the jew enacted witch trials. Think about it: LET'S BURN SOME WHITE WOMEN AT THE STAKE FOR MAKE BELIEVE REASONS THAT HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH CHRISTIANITY GOY!!! Ignoring my forced kike re-enactment: who does that sound like?

And the US has been under jew control since 1865. So you're right on that point.

But it seems you're yearning for an admirable future. But to expect women to live as though that future is here is short-sighted. Think about the alternatives: she could be wearing some pure and ACTUAL skank (harlot) clothes. Showing off her tits, be covered in piercing, and some kike propaganda motto emblazoned across her chest.

That isn't the case. So this is excellent to see.

When we are in a high-trust, safe, morally right society then yes. We can and should expect everyone to dress the part. However now? Absolutely not.

[–] 1 pt

You are not thinking logically.

No, seriously, (and vice versa).

Think about the alternatives: she could be wearing some pure and ACTUAL skank (harlot) clothes.

Yeah, I made for use in my book... Could be worse.