Writing so much to say so little, you have to be a jew. > "The thing with demographic trends is that they change" No, they change when you're experiencing a replacement and during mass migratory events but according to racial and ethnic lines -- they didn't change much at all in the United States for over 150 years... You are demonstrably and blatantly wrong. Demographic trends change all the time, maybe it's that you don't know what... > Demographics represent the make-up of a society. Oh, you don't know what demographic encompass. You confuse it with the racial make up of a society. So now I get why you have such a thin grasp of the subject. Moving on then. > They do not share views on Justice, the nature of Freedom, the nature of economy, personal responsibility versus collective need, or the critical distinction between collectivism and free association. > In Europe there was a couple thousand years of interaction, ideological development, social experiences, and philosophic evolution - something like 97% of modern societal advances come from Europe during the past 500 years. So yes, the German, Italian, Englishman, Frenchman, Norwegian, and Pollack all share degrees of social, scientific, and philosophical evolution. The same cannot be said about the history of South and Central America which does not resemble, in any way, a particularly compatible social model, nor does it's fixation on Communism lend itself to the supporting the continuance of the European tradition. > You cannot select time slice representations and ignore the global trends and the trends are unequivocal. He says using a time slice that ignores hundred of years of European history and concentrate almost exclusively on England and America. And you not only moved the goalpost, but changed them altogether. South America's fixation on socialism derives from European roots. Post Reconquista Spain, HRC, Fascist Spain/Italy/Germany, German Empire, etc. Those were all European societies with a socialist structure as opposed to England and its liberal/individualistic and capitalistic society. They won WW2 so they won the ideological war, but look at the Scandis, France, Germany, Eastern Europe, etc. they still have large socialist structure and socialist parties. What you are seeing in South America is a low IQ version of that. Btw, when I'm talking about socialism, I'm not talking about Marxism (or bolshevism). You might want to read Oswald Spengler Prussian Socialism if you want more info. > I argued that once formal majority status has been lost, the leftist will push for stronger and more violent means of addressing the 'white problem' and that the case is similar to the situation that occurred in Russia over one hundred years ago. You have not argued, you've brought no support for your commentary about being in a situation analogous to Russia in the 1910's. I can say that Whites will only shortly be a minority and that when the push becomes too harsh, the most armed group in human history will form one or more States. It's kind of mind boggling to me that you believe the US are 1910's Russia when the jews took over a weaken government when they've already did it to the US in the 1920/30's.