With respect, this is wrong. You are describing the world at the narrative level, NOT the mechanical level underneath that actually drives the world. This means your description has no past explanatory power nor future predictive power. It is important to analyze the world at the correct level of resolution. If you are too high in resolution the analysis is meaningless, if you are too low it is also meaningless. The way to think about it is this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Are9dDbW24 That video shows all of the different levels of resolution at which you can analyze the world to give you an idea of what I am talking about. So, you are talking one level of resolution above the level that I am analyzing the problem at. You are analyzing it from a narrative level using words, symbolism and framing that humans use to tell stories to each other. This is normal for humans becase that is the level at which all of our communication has operated at for the last 10 million years for our species. It is a fairly good way to transfer information, however, IT IS EXTREMELY LOW RESOLUTION. Another way to say the same thing is you are directionally correct but factually incorrect. Another way to say the same thing is that at the narrative level the resolution at which you can have past explanatory power and future predictive power is a lower resolution than if you zoomed in just one layer below that. The single layer of resolution below that is abstract symoblic representation which in normal parlance is basically just math and logic. RIGHT NEXT to that category I also place a few other categories of knowledge, one of which is the structure of the brain. Those two things sit on different branches of knowledge but are approximately at the same level of resolution. So, at that level we would say things like: * All emotions in our species exist for evolutionary reasons. * All emotions are chemical processes designed for specific circumstances and specific outcomes. * For example, extreme fear keeps you out of the mouth of lions. * Excitement is probably a signaling mechanism gets you prepared for something positive. * Curiosity and expression of related behaviours relative to testosterone vs estrogen directs human males to be higher risk takers. Although the higher risk taking kills off a higher percentage of males statistically it seems to work in the favour of evolutionary survival because on average it generates more benefit to the tribe in terms of access to new resources than it would otherwise have access to. * Female nervous systems seem to be tuned to acquiring a lot of information at extremely small increments in incredibly high detail versus males. The evolutionary reason for this would be that their nervous system is tuned to keeping children alive from birth to about 5 to 7 years old or so. ... and on and on. With respect to love, at this level of resolution, we would say: * In human males, the chemical process of love is a process that SUBJUGATES the subsystems in our brains that drive our independent and individualistic traits, bind us to our partner and keep us at home as opposed to wandering around. The evolutionary reason for this is to guarantee that our kids are raised to be old enough to take care of them selves BECAUSE human females are EXTREMELY EXTREMELY vulnerable when they are pregnant, they can't even survive on their own while they are in the latter part of pregnancy because of our dietary requirements. A pregnant female chimpanzee or gorilla can easily survive on their own during pregnancy, not human females. * In human females, the chemical process of love is a process that SUBJUGATES the subsystem in their brains that drive their subsystems that make them socially open to building potential new relationship and redirects their focus to their partner and preps them for all of the chemical changes in their body INCLUDING THEIR BRAINS. Once women have children their brains undergo a giant amount of changes, they are almost different people once they have the first child. That explains love, it's evolutionary reasoning (roughly) as a process and what it does to males and females in our species. What about hate? In our species, at this level of resolution of analysis, it does the following: * In our species, for human males, it SUPERDOMINATES all of the other subsystems in our brain. Most of the time it is an extremely quiet and seemingly submissive subsystem sitting in the background while all of the other subsystems do their specialized tasks. HOWEVER. When the subsystem that controls hate wakes up, it SUPERDOMINATES all other systems. Depending on the level of hate, it could be as simple as hating how someone breathers to a kind of super hate that will FORCE you to destroy your own life in order to exact revenge. The evolutionary reason that the subsystem for hate exists in our species is because at some point in time 20+ million years ago, as we started to evolve out of a prey species and into a predator (and then super predator) species, our species started to realize that in order to survive sometimes it is easier to predate our own species rather than look for food in the trees or hunt on the ground. We have actually evolved to predate on other groups of great apes (us) as part of our survival strategy. The thinking is that HATE developed in our species as a way to deal with the potential for either someone in our own tribe or another tribe to become a PREDATOR OF OUR TRIBE MEMBERS. Humans (and a few other great apes like the chimps) are predators that prey on their own kind. Hate, at an evolutionary level, SHUTS DOWN all other subsystems that are designed to minimize risky behaviour and what it does is MAXIMIZE risky behaviour in order to get you to do WHATEVER IS REQUIRED to neutralize the potential threat. If it is someone in the tribe, hate will make you take the knife and do what is require. If it is another tribe, hate will make you seethe for years and years and move fucking mountains in order to destroy every single member of another tribe that this subsystem sees as posing a danger to your tribe. Hate has existed in our species probably for 30+ million years. Here is a tribe of chimpanzees that over a 2 year period killed another tribe one by one in raids out of pure hate caused by a social split: https://odysee.com/@countdankula:d/absolute-mad-lads-the-gombe-chimpanzee:a That is the purpose of hate. It is THE MOST IMPORTANT and MOST POWERFUL EMOTION that we have. It is to be understood. It is to be respected. But, most importantly, it is to be fed. The reason white people are in the place we are is because we allowed a parasitic human species to tweak the systems around us in such a way that it de-activated and nutralizes the subsystem that control hate in our brains. You are talking at a layer of analysis above this and it's nice and cute and meaningful if you are talking to someone in your tribe about this over a beer. It is also the ONLY layer of resolution that a hunter gatherer tribe can exchange information because they don't have access to science and higher order information that our civilization has. The problem with your explanation is that, because it is at the wrong layer of resolution, it sets our white species of human into a position where they are prey to other species of human. We need to teach our people to learn how to analyze the world at different layers of resolution, but most importantly, we MUST start activating the subsystems that control hate. It is vitally important for our survival. What is worse is that what you wrote isn't even your own thought. Those are NOT your words. Those are narratives DESIGNED for you and inserted into the white narrative in order to keep you complacent and submissive like a dog. You are not a dog. Stop thinking like one.