Even if true, the absurdity of this statement: " a spike protein being *sent* into the wrong part of a cell"... what? The "vaccine" is implied as some sort of independent actor, which "sends" the spike proteins to a destination that the "vaccine" demands. So in this case, they want us to believe that the vaccine made a fucking mistake. Vaccine was like "Alright, time to send this spike protein to the exact quadrant of this cell.... oh... shit... oh shit! I missed, I, the 'vaccine', have made a terrible mistake- the spike protein was shot into the 'wrong part' of the cell! What have I done!?" Sometimes, boiling this crap down to this level is really effective in making people see how stupid all of this is. I think there is a term for this type of argumentation, "argument ad absurdium" or something along those lines. Usually it's a bullshit argumentation tactic, for example: Rich NFL Nigger breaks into his ex-wife's house and steals some jewelry. He gets caught, and tells the police "Nigga, I gots $200 million in da bank, why would I bes breakin' into dat FUCKIN' BITCH place to take some dang bling?" He's trying to highlight how absurd it is that a millionaire would perform a burglary and theft. In that context, this argumentation is retarded and the source of fallacy. But in the case of the hoax of covid, reducing the facts/stories/anecdotes down to the barest level is all you need to do. One of my favorites: "If covid was half as deadly as we have been told, why haven't most of the homeless people died? Also, third world countries require the entire Western world to come rescue them from outbreaks of diseases such as malaria; how did they survive covid? Africa was almost entirely unaffected by covid, despite most Africans being extremely malnourished and living in absolute squalor. Many of them have compromised immune systems; Africa should be devastated by covid, but they actually had fewer deaths in 2020 than in 2019." This is a great way to highlight how absurdly overblown the threat of covid is.