> or the name of the beast, or the number of his name. https://search.brave.com/search?q=+the+name+of+the+beast%2C+or+the+number+of+his+name+covid19&source=web First result https://academic.logos.com/the-covid-vaccine-has-666-written-all-over-it-and-why-that-doesnt-matter-according-to-revelation/ lol sounds like "Alright, it has 666 all over it... But it doesn't mean what you think it means" In an article published last week on theLAB, COVID-19 and The Mark of the Beast, I claimed that the mark of the beast (666) is most likely not a physical or visible mark (Rev. 13:16). The biggest objection I received from readers had to do with this very point: how could the mark be non-physical and invisible if having the mark was what allowed people to “buy or sell” things (Rev. 13:17)? Wouldn’t the mark need to be visible in order to do that? **Furthermore, isn’t there enough evidence that the vaccine is the “number” of the beast, including a bill currently before the House of Representatives** (6666) and the very letters “C-O-R-O-N-A” themselves?1 These are good questions, and I think a response would be helpful. But first, we need to start from square one and do some background work. C = 3 O = 15 R = 18 O = 15 N = 14 A = 1 6 66 https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/6666?s=1&r=2 "H.R.6666 - COVID-19 Testing, Reaching, And Contacting Everyone (TRACE) Act" Holy fucking shit, UNREAL!!!