Protests in towns 5 hours from a settlement greater than 50,000 tends not to attract much attention. But I have not once worn a mask in a store, used my knowledge of the law to have us exempt at work, and made HR aware that rapid testing is a medical procedure that requires medical training and exposes workers to ethylene oxide in excess of the provincial limits.
>Protests in towns 5 hours from a settlement greater than 50,000 tends not to attract much attention.
Yeah let's say for the sake of the argument that's not some vague made up shit here
So, again, just because you aren't attending a protest doesn't mean you agree or disagree with what the protest is all about
I wholeheartedly agree with protests, but they are a big city thing that are only meaningful as a show of force; peaceful until ignored.
I totally agree, and we're far from alone to think just that. What's a regional protest without MSM coverage? A bear farting in the woods essentially. It's a show of force indeed, democratic or otherwise eventually, through sheer numbers
In the end it's a matter of leverage, means of pressure on .gov, and mass protests to show how grumpy the "customers"/voters are aside, citizen don't have much margin. They can make phone calls en masse.
Of course those limitations are induced by the legal boundaries. Those are lawful protests, like they announce where it's going to take place and for how long, within a particular time window, anything happening outside of those boundaries gets the stick essentially
If the same number of people, were protesting in front of "public servant" homes, it would definitely not have the same impact, in the minds of those public servants, it would become a tad too personal, too close to home, literally. And of course this will never be permitted because "blah"
(post is archived)