Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

[Source (twitter)](https://twitter.com/_/status/1500523777335209987) [Video (opens in new tab)](https://candownloads.cbsaavideo.com/vr/cbsnews/2022/03/06/2009947715641/0306_FTN_blinken1038_913948_5192.mp4?hdnea=st=1646590143~exp=1646849373~acl=/vr/cbsnews/2022/03/06/2009947715641/0306_FTN_blinken1038_913948_5192.mp4*~hmac=0721c60b0939d604ecb58bbcd4309f5f9e0a2f323141e099a23702c728f15239)

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (28).
[–] • 0 pt (edited )

It's not misleading.

yes it is "sending fighter jets to Ukraine" means that NATO is flying them there as an operational action, which is not the case. When the UK "sent planes" to the Falklands, we weren't lending them to the sheep farmers, we were bombing the Argentinians and then flying home

Poland may transport them to the border and abandoning them there, but its Ukrainian pilots doing the flying, not NATO

You know how the title makes it sound because that deliberately makes it sound like an escalation, but the reality is different

[–] • 0 pt

"sending fighter jets to Ukraine" means that NATO is flying them there as an operational action, which is not the case.

but its Ukrainian pilots doing the flying, not NATO

The title doesn't insinuate it's a NATO action at all. It clearly says "NATO countries" have the green light. Not NATO has the green light. Countries that are members of NATO ie. Poland have the green light to send fighter jets to Ukraine. And the US is urging them to do so.

[–] • 0 pt

go ask a normie or a Qtard what he thinks that means then

I bet it's 'OMG, Americans are sending in F-35s...'

[–] • 0 pt

I guess if they can't read well. But if they watched the video that was included. Which by the way is what your article was quoting. They should have no problems understanding. I knew what it meant when i first read it... People don't need you to defend their intelligence for them.