Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

758

Direct video link: https://twitter.com/DavidSacks/status/1775926842257813910

Seems to be a general statement vs something HAPPENING immediately, but this is a continued rejection of Russia's position that Ukraine in NATO is a national security threat to Russia. So much for "diplomacy" from the top US "diplomat"

Direct video link: https://twitter.com/DavidSacks/status/1775926842257813910 Seems to be a general statement vs something HAPPENING immediately, but this is a continued rejection of Russia's position that Ukraine in NATO is a national security threat to Russia. So much for "diplomacy" from the top US "diplomat"

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (9).
[–] • 1 pt

My understanding is that it can be pretty quick, but requires unanimous consent from the existing NATO members. For instance, Sweden's entry was delayed by the Turks because of the various Koran burnings. So all it'll take is one existing NATO member that (a), doesn't want WWIII, and (b) can stand up to the globohomo pressure

[–] • 1 pt

Isn't it plainly stated in the NATO documents that a country cannot join if it's engaged in any active conflicts? Not that rules matter to these people....