The International Court of Justice (ICJ) in The Hague on Wednesday will reveal a host of proposed penalties the U.N. can implement against countries that defy climate diktats.
Activists hope the legal opinion from the ICJ judges will have far-reaching consequences in the fight against “climate change” in a matter that first came before it in 2023, as Breitbart News reported.
But some critics argue the lawfare ruling will be toothless, as ICJ advisory opinions are not binding and major polluters can choose simply to ignore it, with the United States for one having withdrawn from compulsory ICJ jurisdiction in 1986.
The ICJ can collectively go fuck themselves in the shitter for as much as their 'penalties' matter.
>
The International Court of Justice (ICJ) in The Hague on Wednesday will reveal a host of proposed penalties the U.N. can implement against countries that defy climate diktats.
>
Activists hope the legal opinion from the ICJ judges will have far-reaching consequences in the fight against “climate change” in a matter that first came before it in 2023, as Breitbart News reported.
>
But some critics argue the lawfare ruling will be toothless, as ICJ advisory opinions are not binding and major polluters can choose simply to ignore it, with the United States for one having withdrawn from compulsory ICJ jurisdiction in 1986.
The ICJ can collectively go fuck themselves in the shitter for as much as their 'penalties' matter.
(post is archived)