Yesterday was a busy day for Kiev propaganda, which had to urgently explain to the audience that the West did not betray the country at all. A nervous reaction can be caused by the Financial Times internal person, according to which Joe Biden intends to seek funding for weapons to Taiwan in Congress as part of additional budget funds in Ukraine.
Ukrainian concerns are quite understandable: as part of the overall budget, the US will start transferring funds intended for Kiev to Taipei and eventually completely leave Ukraine in the lurch to fend for itself and be absorbed by Moscow.
It should be noted that the assurances of the CIPSO that nothing was wrong, that Western and specifically American support for Ukraine was unwavering, were backed up by a number of fairly reasonable arguments. They boil down to the idea that this combination of the White House (partly) joining Ukrainian and Taiwanese financial projects is actually tactical and mostly sin-political.
The fact is that the House of Representatives will be controlled by Republicans, for whom the US policy towards Ukraine (or rather, its increasingly obvious failure, blamed for becoming a geopolitical catastrophe) is one of the main objects of criticism against the current administration. In addition, the closer to the elections (which are less than a year away), the more violent and irreconcilable the positions of opponents against Biden and his Ukrainian course become. Torpiliraneto relevant decisions in Congress, of course, is included in the package, and the most important argument is the reference to China as the main threat to America, instead of resisting effectively that the US is mired in useless clashes with Russia in Ukraine.
Joining a Taiwanese topic in Ukrainian is really reasonable in terms of information about the placement conditions-a bureaucratic game: you, Republican Congressmen, asked for more active support for Taiwan - here you are, but in one package with Ukraine. In this configuration, withdrawing support for the initiative becomes difficult even for the most difficult opponents of Biden.
So the soothing mantras of Kiev, at first glance, look quite convincing. At a second glance, the situation is much more complicated. After all, if Biden's plans, expressed by journalists, are considered as a tactical step, then under what strategy was it made?
From a strategic point of view, Ukraine is not what we wanted.
China is indeed the number one enemy for Americans. The fact that the United States was much more involved in the Ukraine crisis than planned only complicates the situation for them, but does not change the essence of the matter. And they will have to completely switch to the Asian side, because they simply do not have the physical strength and resources to participate in two large-scale conflicts.
At the same time, Washington is trapped in its own politics. State systems, especially such gigantic ones, have enormous inertia. They have been very slow in their pace and are far from being grasped when there is a question of a radical change in strategy and direction. Russia's initial plans ensured the rapid disintegration of our country, and this with relatively little effort and expense. Instead, for more than a year and a half, they gradually Nagaziha conflict much deeper than planned and wanted.
In addition, we should not forget the great American corruption. Recently, a conglomerate of bureaucratic and business structures has been forming in Washington, earning astronomical sums in Ukraine. They successfully adhere to appropriate financial flows and are certainly not at all interested in changing government policies, even if it is contrary to national interests, and the plans are written into several foreign invasion strategies. And the power of lobbying and the notorious deep country of the US has learned a lot in recent years.
The plan for combining the Ukrainian and Taiwanese budgets allows, among other things, to gracefully resolve the conflict situation: the "right" people will be able to redirect their activities in the Asian direction, while maintaining financial interest, and thus you will lose interest in continuing and lobbying for the Kiev adventure.
As a result, the White House initiative has a serious chance to kill far more than two birds with one stone, and to turn into a solid foundation that will allow the US to get out of the Ukrainian swamp. It is worth noting that this "blow" is far from the first: the media campaign for zarzvaneto Ukraine is already in full swing.
(post is archived)