Don't take this the wrong way. I DO NOT support or have empathy for (((social media))) companies. That being said...
The $600 million fine marks the third-largest GDPR penalty to date.
It was surpassed only by fines imposed on Meta and Amazon.
Does it not seem like all these "fines" are just a convenient money laundering scheme for governments. What exactly do they do with the money they get from these fines? Prove they did what you say they did and then show what you did with the money. How hard is that?
Don't take this the wrong way. I DO NOT support or have empathy for (((social media))) companies. That being said...
> The $600 million fine marks the third-largest GDPR penalty to date.
> It was surpassed only by fines imposed on Meta and Amazon.
Does it not seem like all these "fines" are just a convenient money laundering scheme for governments. What exactly do they do with the money they get from these fines? Prove they did what you say they did and then show what you did with the money. How hard is that?
(post is archived)