i like this solution. its much more elegant than my '... therefore the east and west 'edges' both have to be in the US, so youre a lie' explanation.
i like this solution. its much more elegant than my '... therefore the east and west 'edges' both have to be in the US, so youre a lie' explanation.
'... therefore the east and west 'edges' both have to be in the US, so youre a lie'
What? That makes no sense.
> '... therefore the east and west 'edges' both have to be in the US, so youre a lie'
What? That makes no sense.
(post is archived)