In reality though, Ashkenazi Jews are still Aryans and are technically a branch of the Scythians that traveled through Europe from the far east. Ashkenazis aren't the same as those inbred Jews. Just saying. Yes, Ashkenazi Jews are without a doubt subversive, but not all. The subversivness can be attributed to them being religiously Jewish. Now that's the trick with the Jews. Jews can be a people and a religion, so this is why people get confused with both. It's like saying Sephardic Jews are the same as those Chabad jews from Israel. They're different. Sephardics are basically Spanish people that are of the Jewish faith. Chabads are straight up Jewish inbreds.
I'm not looking to start a fight or argument ... I have to merely disagree on the claim they are aryans. They are genetic jews that come from the disgusting group of people from the middle east.
Someone was telling me here a while back that jews are white people that travelled to the Israel region, built white civilizations there and then lost everything through interbreeding with adjacent shitskins.
None of that rings true to me. Jews have not been in Europe for a long time, they are recent migrants from the middle east.
Even if one were to argue, our people conquered the northern parths of the asian steppes all the way to the pacific into northern japan as some have argued and as evidence shows by our mummies being found all throughout the region, even if they survived through interbreeding with these lesser genetic stock, I can no longer accept them as one of our own.
It simply isn't a step I am capable of making.
You don't have to believe me, but the history is not for you to remove from the record. The "12" tribes of Israel is an Aryan thing. Only 1 of those tribes is connected to the inbred Jews (tribe of Judah) and even that is debatable. Even the star of David is not a Jewish thing. It's thousands of years older and is technically an alchemical symbol where female and male are merged (triangle upside down = female and triangle upside = male).
Here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XXL09iWJrfs That explains a bit about the history of what I'm saying from an anthropological and archeological perspective. If you want the relevant part of our discussion, you'll have to forward it to around the middle of the video, otherwise I suggest you watch the whole thing to get a better perspective of everything.
Fair enough. We could also be talking past each other. Your mental image might be different from mine on the general subject matter.
In my mind, I simply take Albania + anything east of the beginning of the Turkish border and simple lable them as filth. How they got to their current genetic degenerate state through intermixing and so forth is probably interesting reading but it has no bearing on the reality that they either are not white or are no longer white.
If you wanted to point form how things were originally and how they got to where they are currently, I would read them with interest. A lot of people on this board have proposed interesting perspectives that I was not aware of, so more are welcome.
Or links to online summaries or similar would be great too.
But, they are not white. At all.
I saw a post recently that argued jews are more vulnerable to pathogens, would be hilarious if all it took to fix their insanity was some horse dewormer.
(post is archived)