Jesuits and Jews shouldn't be conflated. They have a lot of the same goals and sometimes work for the same people, but it isn't so simple. Yes, "Jews" infiltrated them and influenced them over the years, but that's more because Catholics were jews the whole time, not because it's the same organization.
Jesuits were formed after the pagan shabbos goy Catholics spanned far and wide. From the beginning, they reflected a lot of "Jewish" influence, mainly because of their sharing religious doctrine. Prior to the coalescence of "Jews" across the world, largely from Europe, especially Germany, to Israel after Britain granted it to "Jews" under demand of the Rothschilds, "Jews" were just playing the infiltration game. Roths game them a home base and now that they're organized, along with Jesuits having a home in New Rome, Vatican City, both of the groups have vivid distinctions.
They are either ethnically Jewish or not. The Jews didn't infiltrate their order if their founder was a Marrano from the start. The Jesuits were the infiltration vessel into Catholicism, which, as you say, already had major issues.
No, Catholicism was never not infiltrated. It was the facade D&C mechanism used to pull Christians away from the noseless practices which used the same mysticism and ancient arts the "Jews" use and call their own. The truth is "Jews" stole all of that shit from what Christians also stemmed from. The curious part is "Jews" twisted the ancient knowledge and hid the useful parts.
There are no "ethnic Jews" as you know them today. Hell, Aryans are technically "Jews", but to understand that frame of reference, we have to do a whole lot of reframing. The problem is you guys all use shitty and diluted terms to describe what you're talking about and you get in to these linguistic pitfalls that obscure your ability to further comprehend the translation between old perspectives and nuanced and modern perspectives.
No, Catholicism was never not infiltrated.
You almost confused me with that double negative. Are you saying that Constantine was ethnically Jewish? I would make a distinction with the Cult of Mithra and Jews, just as I make a distinction with Italians and Jews, although the paradigm of Kabbalah is very much related to the kinds of beliefs the Mithra cultists had. It's one thing to be equally corrupt or corrupt in the same cultural ways, but another to be directly under the control of and benefitting the Jews (as a cult or faction bound by blood).
There are no "ethnic Jews"
Ashkenazi or Sephardi are ethnically distinct people but I get your point, they are apart of a mixed multitude, the Arabs & Palestinians are related to them, but the Jews have a considerable amount of European admixture. The Ashkenazi can be up to 50% MENA, and they are all related to the same 350 non-European ancestors.
Hell, Aryans are technically "Jews", but to understand that frame of reference, we have to do a whole lot of reframing.
Ok, the real Phoenician Israelites were "Aryan," to me that is obvious, just because of what is written in the Bible. If the Jews wrote it they wouldn't need an additional book to warp it to suite their nature. The Babylonians also said their original settlers were blonde like the people of Aratta, to the north, before mixing with Dilmun migrants, and the Babylonians are considered descendants of Shem.
The problem is you guys all use shitty and diluted terms to describe what you're talking about and you get in to these linguistic pitfalls
I try not to, I'm not as bad as some people here. Sometimes you have to simplify things and then just explain if someone asks. It's not as if you are doing a very good job naming specifics.
(post is archived)