WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

So, the headlines speak for themselves.

So, the headlines speak for themselves.

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt (edited )

Anecdotal from personal observation. I'm old enough to remember when I first heard the term "conspiracy theory" enter the public lexicon. Over time I began noticing that things that had been labeled "conspiracy theory" just a couple years before had been converted into "accepted fact".

As the internet grew and the hive mind grew with it, the conversion rate seemed to be accelerating. I think this may also be in part due to the change in people's acceptance of what the controlled media is putting out as "The Approved Narrative". As the public trust of controlled media sources plummets, the conversion rate from "conspiracy theory" to "accepted fact" accelerates to keep pace.

There is also an intelligence barrier. Liberals like what the media tells them, because it reinforces their reality. They are comfortable with it and less accepting of contrary views. When the evidence that a previous "conspiracy theory" has become incontrovertible and has converted to an "accepted fact" the liberal simply hand waves it away, because accepting it might mean that he would then also have to question other facets of his world-view. The amygdala kicks in, and he flees, pretending that it never happened at all.

Now it is simply common knowledge that everything the government and media (but I repeat myself) say is The Lie. Including the words "a", "and", and "the". But the public is also becoming much more adept over the years in "reading between the lines" and perceiving the shadow of truth behind the lies. In a weird sort of application of Aristotelian logic, "Okay. If "A" is known to be a lie because (((they))) say so, and "B" is also a known lie, because (((they))) say so, then this other thing over here, that (((they))) clearly dare not speak of and reflexively label a "conspiracy theory", MUST therefore be the truth.

[–] 0 pt

Cool. You're on to something here. Shrodinger is permeating internet consensus. We're pretty far beyond flexible reality accepting itself. Consensus means nothing. Everything is both true and not true. Many people are both alive and dead as far as "the internet" knows. We've entered an era of Truth being dictated by parties with stronger comparative Will than any adversary.

Truth just got privatized. Yay.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

Well, when (((they))) realized that a significant percentage of the population was on to them and that they could no longer exercise full control over The Narrative, they switched to a demoralization strategy by increasing the noise to signal ratio, to increase the difficulty of discerning true from false. If all data is equally true, then all data is equally false. If the signal strength for all the data is equal, then most people just give up, because the effort of discerning the true from the false becomes like listening to a patchy AM radio station out in the desert, mostly static, with occasional almost understandable words randomly mixed in. It just becomes too much work, and doesn't do anything to put beans on the table.

https://z.zz.fo/9wYbP.png