mutual-exclusivity is not a precondition for things not being coincidences. What does that even mean? What argument are you trying to make? If anything, it's the abuse-of-vagueness and lack of pattern-recognition which makes people unable to see the obvious.
mutual-exclusivity is not a precondition for things not being coincidences. What does that even mean? What argument are you trying to make? If anything, it's the abuse-of-vagueness and lack of pattern-recognition which makes people unable to see the obvious.
(post is archived)