Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

Here is the document

CBER Plans for Monitoring COVID-19 Vaccine Safety and Effectiveness https://www.fda.gov/media/143557/download

first Jab Dec 14th 2020 https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smithsonian-institution/first-vial-used-us-covid-19-vaccinations-joins-smithsonian-collections-180977194/

FDA&CDC Knew https://www.bitchute.com/video/0n0hl9lLQabE/

Active Surveillance Passive Surveillance Using BEST, CBER plans to monitor about 15 adverse events External Link Disclaimerthat have been seen with the deployment of previous vaccines but have yet to be associated with a safety concern for an authorized COVID-19 vaccine at this time. CBER further plans to use the BEST system to conduct more in-depth analyses should a safety concern be identified from sources such as VAERS.

https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/safety-availability-biologics/covid-19-vaccine-safety-surveillance The Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) at the FDA is monitoring the safety of authorized COVID-19 vaccines through both passive and active safety surveillance systems. CBER is doing so in collaboration with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), and other academic and large non-government healthcare data systems. In addition, CBER participates actively in ongoing international pharmacovigilance efforts, including those organized by the International Coalition of Medicines Regulatory Authorities (ICMRA) and the World Health Organization (WHO). These efforts are in addition to the pharmacovigilance efforts being undertaken by the individual manufacturers for authorized vaccines. A coordinated and overlapping approach using state-of the art technologies has been implemented.

Here is the document CBER Plans for Monitoring COVID-19 Vaccine Safety and Effectiveness https://www.fda.gov/media/143557/download first Jab Dec 14th 2020 https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smithsonian-institution/first-vial-used-us-covid-19-vaccinations-joins-smithsonian-collections-180977194/ FDA&CDC Knew https://www.bitchute.com/video/0n0hl9lLQabE/ Active Surveillance Passive Surveillance Using BEST, CBER plans to monitor about 15 adverse events External Link Disclaimerthat have been seen with the deployment of previous vaccines **but have yet to be associated with a safety concern for an authorized COVID-19 vaccine at this time**. CBER further plans to use the BEST system to conduct more in-depth analyses should a safety concern be identified from sources such as VAERS. https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/safety-availability-biologics/covid-19-vaccine-safety-surveillance **The Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research** (CBER) at the FDA is monitoring the safety of authorized COVID-19 vaccines through both passive and active safety surveillance systems. CBER is doing so in collaboration with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (**CDC**), the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), and other academic and large non-government healthcare data systems. In addition, CBER participates actively in ongoing international pharmacovigilance efforts, including those organized by the International Coalition of Medicines Regulatory Authorities (ICMRA) and the World Health Organization (**WHO**). These efforts are in addition to the pharmacovigilance efforts being undertaken by the individual manufacturers for authorized vaccines. A coordinated and overlapping approach using state-of the art technologies has been implemented.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (14).
[–] • 2 pts

That's a document describing what they adverse effects they would survail. I'd hope there would be internal documents like that before a release. Not exactly a smoking gun.

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

mostly agree i do kind of regret the post title...but it does show they planned to monitor & anticipated these side effects, right?, as happened with previous vaxxes, then went on to say 'safe & effective' without explaining these possibilities and their chances. Also cohencidental that these are the most common side effects, which also appear to be the side effects of the Jab...Which doesn't rule out, and raises the question, that do All their 'vaccinations' cause these side effects? Are they all slow kill shots? The active monitoring, and hands on surveillance doesn't mean they Aren't obviscating the truth. It's like the fox saying he will just be monitoring the hen house, and survielling the chicken death reports. And since the baseline side effects are the same as a bioweapon, nothing to see here, anything causing bioweapon damage is just part & parcel of vaccination, and not a smoking gun. It shows some foreknowlege, and a plan to address bad press & unfavorable reports. For example But I'm with you, it can be looked at as innocent.

[–] • 1 pt

Both the mRNA and viral vector vaccines are a completely new technology. They don't have a history to look at, but they could look at the trials data. So this list is a list of the side effects observed at the trials. They were very silent about the trial results - with such a big list openly communicated, the vaccination hesitancy would have been 90%.