Just passed by Neil DeGrasse Tyson's youtube video about the moon landing. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uTChrirK-hw His arguments amount to: 1. "We saw the rocket take off." 2. "It would be easier to go to the moon than to fake all the documents and designs." "So, yeah, no. We went to the Moon." Insert Climate Change narrative. For a world renowned physicist, this seems like retard explanation. What evidence do we have that this guy actually has any intelligence, at all? He sounds like an actual idiot. His argument's are elementary to shred. Socrates would shred No.1 in a single question. "What if the rocket didn't go to the Moon, and, instead, went literally anywhere else?" Do we have any real world examples of this? Yes. In fact, the vast majority of rocket launches are not broadcast, leaving plenty of footage to draw from. The vast majority of these rockets never go to the moon, they merely deliver satellite payloads. https://www.nbcnews.com/video/south-korea-rocket-launch-fails-to-deliver-dummy-payload-into-orbit-124234821923 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fB_ZlORvD4c So, we know they can fake realistic, drama filled rocket launches and not all rockets have to carry a real payload. We have real world examples. To argue that a rocket launch is impossible to fake is idiocy. There are many examples. To argue that no one has ever sent a dummy payload is idiocy. There are many examples. Why is this fake physicist taken seriously? As to No. 2, "The Rothschild Leak" comes to mind. The Internet has all but scrubbed this one, like the faked Epstein suicide video, where they had a replica cell made. But, the point of the "Rothschild Leak" was to discredit the Podesta Leaks. It was 32GB, far more data than was faked for the lunar landing, and it was faked in a matter of weeks after the Podesta emails were released on Wikileaks. Not only were they able to fake 32GBs of documents, they were also able to scrub the Internet of the leak, almost completely, when Internet users proved (within a single day) that the leaks were fake af. https://archive.md/bnhVK This seems to be a common "debunking" strategy. https://pic8.co/sh/bxz7EE.png Military.com suggests that such a conspiracy would require 411,000 people to keep a secret. Again, this argument is a stupid red herring. We already had a Great Moon Hoax in 1835. Not enough documents and articles? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Moon_Hoax We also know that Enron fraudulently generated far more documents than the Moon Landing required, to the tune of over $70 Billion. We also know the establishment media played along throughout the entire fraud, ONLY TO REPEAT a massive scandal with an Enron executive's daughter where Theranos pumped out tons of misinformation about a product that was entirely bogus. Only idiots insist that massive frauds don't regularly take place in society. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enron_scandal So, can it be done? Yes. Has it been done? Yes. The argument that "it would be too big" is pure idiocy, as it has happened and we have a fair number of examples. To give people the benefit of the doubt that they would not lie for money or ideology is also idiocy. Personally, after having gone around the Moon debates a number of times, I'll tell you that I would not use these arguments to debate on either side. My first concern is the "phone call" between the President and the astronauts. While we can certainly send radio waves to the moon, a backpack walkie talkie is almost certainly not going to pull off a two way conversation to Earth. Even in this day and age. I also think it is problematic that they destroyed all of the footage. We have a plethora of fake rocks, as well. https://pic8.co/sh/jqRHVT.png We do, indeed, have modern contracts with Nokia and energy companies to put facilities on the Moon. https://www.nokia.com/about-us/news/releases/2020/10/19/nokia-selected-by-nasa-to-build-first-ever-cellular-network-on-the-moon/ https://www.the-sun.com/tech/4169991/nasa-moon-nuclear-power-plant/ So, while I may still be on the fence about whether the moon landing is fake or not, I am 100% certain that the people arguing the lunar landing was totally real are idiots, as they do not use sound logic or any facts, at all. I do not understand why this idiot, Neil DeGrasse Tyson, is assigned any credibility, at all. He is either a a total idiot, a lying asshole, or both. "Intellectually dishonest" is why he deserves to have his teeth kicked in. Corruption happens. Jack Parsons was a devil worshipper. Let's not blindly trust potential criminals.