Some anarchist somewhere is probably thinking "why destroy your own television, when you can go to walmart and destroy theirs?".
In capitalism, you deny your opponents the ability to operate by making everything more expensive.
In communism, you deny your opponents the ability to operate simply by making sure they starve to death so they're not even alive to challenge you.
In national socialism, you put your opponents in safety camps complete with pools, theaters, medical, and food, and deport them, even as your soldiers and citizens starve and die
In totalitarianism you put them in camps and work them to death and/or execute them.
In socialism, you just do communism, but slower.
In national socialism, you put your opponents in safety camps complete with pools, theaters, medical, and food, and deport them, even as your soldiers and citizens starve and die
lmao
capitalism is solely and nothing more than the freedom for even cunts like you to own a means of production.
Get it fuking right or Stfu.
Capitalism isn't a system.. Capitalism is the absence of systems.
Truly economic free range humans doing as they please.
Capitalism is the absence of systems.
Then there is no capitalism anywhere on earth. The US, being regarded as capitalistic, is full of regulations that only punish the mom 'n pop shops. The giants like Amazon, Microsoft, Google, etc, all get away with breaking the law as much as they want since they are the law.
Oh I agree.
Echos of a long dead capitalist society
"real capitalism is actually a utopia i swear it's not system of consumption real capitalism has never been tried if it was then it'd be perfect".
Do you know what happens in an absence of systems? a new system rises to fill the power vacuum.
Capitalism always leads to totalitarianism.
Oh bullshit. A family alone in the wild west. Clearly capitalist because they own their means of production and operate it as they see fit.
In comes a fukwit like you.
Now cunt. Quantify your fuking statement. How did that family under capitalism explicitly or implicitly call for totalitarianism?
I'll give you a hand. Under commucvntism the means of production has to first taken by force from prior owners into the hands of the state. Ergo communism implicitly calls for an authoritarian because a strongman is demanded in order to steal other people's stuff.
Good fuking luck claiming that capitalism does the same.
Take my advice. Stfu on economics unless you want to ask questions and finally learn the subject
Capitalism isn't a system..Capitalism is the absence of systems.
What you're talking about is the free market.
Capitalism is a free market but free market only refers to prices. Capitalism is more than a free market. It's also HOW we use our means of production. Ie absence if regulations.
Capitalism is also freedom. Not needing kings permission slips to fulfill wants and needs aka absence of licenses.
Capitalism is an absence of systems. Want to have a shared commune or coop? It's still capitalism as long as ppl are free to join leave and operate as they will and take what is theirs.
Capitalism means economically free range humans and so of course elites HATE capitalism as all wealth stems from people and therefor you can become wealthy by owning ppl.
Socialism of any form is all about teaching sheep to hate freedom and ligitimize wolves owning everything.
So the elites teach kids to grow up hating capitalism
(post is archived)