His delivery has always been what caused a lot of people to disregard him. It's really too bad because there is so much truth in his rants, but you just have to be able to digest what he is saying.
It still is.
I wasn't sure if he was a disinfo agent or not for ages, until I saw an interview with Rogan where he describes suffering a head injury as he was pile driven when he was a teenager.
Serious.
Anyway, head injuries like that will change a kids personality. I have spoken with people where kids fell from a bunk bed, hit their head and the kid was fine but their personality changed. I guess the brain can rewire it self if the damage is not severe enough.
This is why he is the way he is.
What I don't understand is why everyone is trying to get him kicked off of social media. If you want to really discredit us you should boost Alex Jones more and he will make all of us look like a bunch of nutjobs. Getting him banned gave him legitimacy which was just enough to bring him over the top into the mainstream. AJ is actually now accepted into huge areas of the mainstream up including the center right and center left. The only people that don't believe him are the extreme left.
Sort of an internet street cred?
I think youre beginning to understand what his role has been the whole time.
He could benefit from following the delivery techniques of modern vloggers. Establish common ground with the listener's viewpoint, referring to older videos that go into more depth if it is not common knowledge. Then introduce the new claim, pointing out relevant articles or videos to back it up, and the more mind-blowing it is the slower it needs to be rolled out.
AJ usually fails on each if these delivery points, constantly overwhelming the listener with claims based on earlier claims, until he has ranted for 10 minutes about something that the listener has no way of verifying.
(post is archived)