I agree that the Big Bang is non-science. I don't claim to know how the universe works or came into being aside from my belief in a divine creator.
My understanding of the Big Bang Theory is they postulate at the very beginning, the universe was extremely dense, with all the matter in the universe condensed into an infinitely small space. In the early moments after the bang, the universe undergoes expansion, becoming less and less dense as all particles move away from one another. By smashing protons or ions together at 99.9999% of the speed of light, they theorize that they can simulate those early universe conditions and thereby draw conclusions about how the universe came into being.
Like most government-funded science projects, I believe the real purpose here is to steal money and to swindle the gullible public with their bogus results, charts of fantasy subatomic particles like quarks and mesons and bosons, etc. It should also come as no surprise to anybody here that CERN was founded under the direction of Niels Bohr, a jew whose mother came from a wealthy jewish banking family. In fact the prevalence of jews throughout the history of theoretical physics discredits the field as a whole.
It should also come as no surprise to anybody here that CERN was founded under the direction of Niels Bohr, a jew whose mother came from a wealthy jewish banking family. In fact the prevalence of jews throughout the history of theoretical physics discredits the field as a whole.
👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
“Theoretical physics” is to science as “modern art” is to the humanities.
(post is archived)