WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.3K

(post is archived)

[–] 2 pts

So to sum this up without expending hours of deep digs on each of the assertions within this thread, we must see (((them))) pushing parents into a microchip solution for their kids through the usual fear porn tactics within the next few days/weeks/months in order for this theory to be correct. And what if that overt push doesn't happen?

[–] 2 pts
[–] 2 pts

I knew the masons have been involved with this since the late 1980s. MYCHIP does not <yet> involve microchipping kids, only collecting pictures, video, dental imprints, fingerprints, DNA, scent, etc ... to create an info package of the usual things needed to assist law enforcement identify the kid. At face value, this effort has been lauded by law enforcement and seems like a valuable tool in identifying lost children. Also ... they claim:

All of the identifying information collected at the event about the child is given to the child’s family. The GACHIP programme retains only the permission slip that must be signed before participation in the event. AII other data is permanently erased after the child’s document is prepared.

Chipping the kids like pets is a big step beyond what is claimed to be the current SOP when collecting this bio evidence and creating the packets for the parents. The chips would either need to contain all of that collected info or refer to a master db that contains it.

I will be very curious to see where this goes. If I see a push to imbed chips in kids like with pets, that will be a major advancement beyond their <reported> current MYCHIP standards and lend validity to the theory that Sound of Freedom is a (((DS))) psyop.