Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

978

experts warn of possible negative side effects of the program, like gender stereotyping

Jews just don't want little white girls to grow up and be women. If this was a black, gay, or trans doll, I'm sure it would be a-ok

>experts warn of possible negative side effects of the program, like gender stereotyping Jews just don't want little white girls to grow up and be women. If this was a black, gay, or trans doll, I'm sure it would be a-ok

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (6).
[–] • 1 pt

Barbie doesn’t have kids, officially. The child dolls are all her sisters, cousins, students and babysitting charges, not her children.

The kids might play with them a particular way, but the toys, themselves were always sex dolls, from the start, and the jew who brought them to America was a women’s lib cunt.

Toy makers have made proper family and home dolls with moms, dads and kids going back to the 19th century.

The Barbie was a zeitgeist meant to sexualize young girls and drive them away from families. The Barbie movie that came out is 100% in lockstep with the original intent of the brand.

[–] • 1 pt

Yep, it’s the camel’s nose in the tent. Or rather, the jew’s nose in your house.

[–] • 0 pt

The barbie videos my kids watched were pre in your face jewism (think vhs) , and there was nothing more than ~20 year old barbie learning how to take care of horses or houses, dogs, cooking / cleaning. No work, no sexuality, major things like that didn't exist, so my view is probably out of date.