Likely from airplane. Secondly, camera sensors are sensitive to a broader frequency range than the human eye. It's why filters are usually placed on sensors to restrict frequencies. The question becomes, were they taking pictures and the fire and discovered the beams? Did they see the disturbance such a beam would make?
In do agree, is very unlikely the beam itself would be visible. It is however possible atmospheric distortion makes them visible. Lots of stuff in the air, including moisture.
Likely from airplane. Secondly, camera sensors are sensitive to a broader frequency range than the human eye. It's why filters are usually placed on sensors to restrict frequencies. The question becomes, were they taking pictures and the fire and discovered the beams? Did they see the disturbance such a beam would make?
In do agree, is very unlikely the beam itself would be visible. It is however possible atmospheric distortion makes them visible. Lots of stuff in the air, including moisture.
Looks more like camera flare to me.
Looks more like camera flare to me.
Could be. I do know there was some evidence on the ground of beams. Did that mean these pics are legit? I dunno.
Could be. I do know there was some evidence on the ground of beams. Did that mean these pics are legit? I dunno.
I always have an open mind, but I tend to default to Occam’s razor. 🤷🏻♂️
I always have an open mind, but I tend to default to Occam’s razor. 🤷🏻♂️
(post is archived)