WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

"When you have eliminated all which is impossible then whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth."

By your logic, the towers were equally likely to have been destroyed by metal and concrete eating bacteria.

It is impossible that there would be no rubble (to say the least) so whatever remains however improbable (pesky DEW) must be the truth.

You have done everything in your ability to keep from eliminating DEWs as a possibility because you want this to be the true answer. I can (and have) removed DEWs as a probably explanation many times but people like you don't want to accept that because you desperately want to live in fear of such a weapon because it justifies your inaction and ignorance. If (((they))) had DEWs, I guarantee it would have been used to vaporize Trump already.

[–] 0 pt

>because you want this to be the true answer>>

Actually I would prefer to be wrong cause it's pretty scary stuff if real.

[–] 0 pt

Actually I would prefer to be wrong cause it's pretty scary stuff if real.

And that is why I spend time and effort to write these walls of text on these particular subject matter (physics, lasers, electronics). I have knowledge and experience that allows me to illuminate the dark areas and dispel the fear. Our capabilities in physics are too primitive to see any such weapons any time soon. Fortunately God made physics for his benefit not ours and we are just bumbling fools in his arena of science. If you want something to truly be fearful of because our bumbling foolishness has actually produced dangerous results, look no further than biology. We're much more likely to have biological weapons take us out than any physics-based weapons. That's worth keeping you up at night for.

[–] 1 pt

>We're much more likely to have biological weapons take us out than any physics-based weapons. That's worth keeping you up at night for.

Makes sense, yeah that's scarier. I think.