Well, I remember there was a video of a school teacher doing an experiment with his class. Two isolated containers. Inside each were seeds ready to start growing, and one of the containers also had something that emitted wifi or something like that up and running. The container without the device grew, while the one that DID have the device did not.
The experiment was about between a week and three weeks long, I think. Been a while since I saw the video.
But it makes you think.
Well, I remember there was a video of a school teacher doing an experiment with his class. Two isolated containers. Inside each were seeds ready to start growing, and one of the containers also had something that emitted wifi or something like that up and running. The container without the device grew, while the one that DID have the device did not.
I am familiar with that video. While there was some attempts to make it a proper scientific experiment, the overall experiment did not control for other variables that could have explained the outcome. The experiment was not multiple times to determine if there truly was a correlation between the process and the results. The whole video seemed to start with the assumption that the plants with the signal would behave differently so there was definitely bias in the experiment.
My background and knowledge as an electrical engineer and physics (I work as a software engineer now though) tells me that the fears of EMF radiation are mostly unwarranted. I have seen plants thrive in lots of places where high power output EMF radiation is constant and I have also had plenty of exposure to it myself with no discernable effects. People seem to think that being exposed to EMF radiation is a new thing, but we have all been bombarded by it throughout our lives so there is no way to get a proper "baseline" for non-exposed individuals. It's everywhere from both man-made and natural sources so there's no escaping it. I'm just not convinced of the threat and fear because I have worked in this realm professionally and very closely. I fear the effects of exposure to small gasoline engines more than I do EMF radiation. I find it odd that no one else seems to think they are a problem but are quick to distrust EMF producing devices.
Fair enough, I just felt that bringing up the video in question would be pertinent to the conversation. We all know that school experiments obviously aren't indicative of 100% fool proof rigorous study, but it DOES raise some questions and should garner some curiosity, and I think it should actually be studied more in depth. But of course, we all know that there wouldn't be any funding for it because it might hurt governmental interests if the truth were to get out. Like how studies on circumcision were banned because they would hurt jewish interests.
We all know that school experiments obviously aren't indicative of 100% fool proof rigorous study, but it DOES raise some questions and should garner some curiosity, and I think it should actually be studied more in depth.
Agreed. It should be studied more but not by total amateurs and high school students. It should also be generally accepted that experiments done on a level like this one should NOT be used as proof or truth when evaluating the safety of such things.
But of course, we all know that there wouldn't be any funding for it because it might hurt governmental interests if the truth were to get out.
The government is not the only group that could conduct studies on things like this. I don't trust government studies on scientific topics because they have often agendas, but fortunately there are other non-government groups who do work on this. There needs to be objectivity in the research and testing of EMF radiation effects (and other topics) because it is just as easy and likely for non-government groups to decide that they want to find harmful effects and conduct their studies starting from there. As an engineer and scientist, I really do hate that all sides bring politics into something that should be entirely science-based instead. I'm not going to trust a high school experiment just because it was not a government experiment. Both sides need to be questioned until there are widespread and reproducible results from all over the world. Even then we can continue to question it because that's the scientific method.
Like how studies on circumcision were banned because they would hurt jewish interests.
That happens only because we let the jews corrupt science, politics and the economy. Don't blame scientists and engineers as a whole for the lies spread by jews.
(post is archived)