Until firing, he's done nothing more than "terroristic threats". At 200ish yards, he's a possible threat but you can't be sure he's aimed at whoever is at the podium. Preemptively killing him would allow the government to write whatever claims they wanted about him that justifies them killing him.
Go point a gun at a cop, (((FBI))), (((SS))) or any other bootlicker and see how long you live without pulling the trigger.
>Until firing, he's done nothing more than "terroristic threats". At 200ish yards, he's a possible threat but you can't be sure he's aimed at whoever is at the podium. Preemptively killing him would allow the government to write whatever claims they wanted about him that justifies them killing him.
Go point a gun at a cop, (((FBI))), (((SS))) or any other bootlicker and see how long you live without pulling the trigger.
There's a term for that scenario and is designed to protect the zogbots - suicide by cop.
There's a term for that scenario and is designed to protect the zogbots - suicide by cop.
(post is archived)