It's from Miles Mathis. Glad you like his stuff. You might also like this one by him: http://mileswmathis.com/phoenper.pdf
Some things you may not know about the Derek Chauvin Trial
by Miles Mathis
First published April 21, 2021
PART 1
1) Chauvin tried to plead guilty to 3rd degree murder, but we are told US Attorney General Bill Barr wouldn't accept that plea. Ridiculous, because the US Attorney General had nothing to do with accepting that plea or not. This is just legal storytelling for the unwashed. Chauvin was being tried by the State of Minnesota, not by the Feds. That's why they call it State of Minnesota v. Derek Chauvin. And even if this had been tried in federal court, the plea would be accepted by prosecutors in the case, not by the Attorney General. 2) It was the first criminal trial in Minnesota to be entirely televised and the first in state court to be broadcast live. Since the state had previous statutes against televising trials—that's why they never had—we should be told why and how that statute was bypassed. Did the legislature pass a variance? No. Did the judge decide it on his own authority? No, because he didn't have that authority. That decision is not invested in judges. That by itself indicates the whole trial was faked by the CIA. Only fake CIA trials are televised, as I have established in many previous papers. 3) Special Agent James Reyerson of the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension testified in cross examination by the defense that normal procedure was not followed in the Chauvin case. He admitted that normally the BCA investigates the case and writes a report, which is then delivered to the proper authorities, who then decide whether to press charges. But in this case charges were brought immediately, before any state investigation was even started. Of course this indicates the entire event was pre-planned, and was rushed to the newspapers and then to trial for political purposes. Although the page on the trial at Wikipedia mentions Reyerson's testimony, it conspicuously fails to include this. 4) In similar cross examination, it was admitted that 50 BCA officers, 27 FBI agents, 440 reports, and 400 witnesses stood against Chauvin in trial, including his entire department and his police chief. Why would 27 FBI agents be involved? Again, this wasn't a federal crime and the FBI had zero jurisdiction. . . unless it was a manufactured event. It also didn't require 50 BCA officers or 440 reports. It required one report filed by a handful of officers. Also, it is very abnormal for a police department and chief not to support their own officer, especially in a case where a heavily drugged “victim” was involved. Despite that, within a month of the incident, long before a trial or investigation, Chauvin's chief Medaria Arradondo called him a murderer in the press. Arradondo also appeared on 60 Minutes within that month. 5) Yes, it was admitted in trial that Floyd had three times a fatal dose of Fentanyl in his system at the time. So Chauvin's department and chief had plenty of cause to support him. And yet they lined up to testify against him, though they weren't present at the event. Very strange. Once again, it supports the thesis this was all staged. 6) Eric Nelson, Chauvin's alleged attorney, was almost asleep during jury selection, paying no attention to the process. He let the prosecution select whomever it wanted. Again, this indicates a hoax, since jury selection would be vital to any hope of an acquittal. But Nelson clearly knew it didn't matter: the whole thing was scripted, so objecting to jurors would have been a waste of time. 7) Nelson failed to ask for a change of venue, and allowed all the jurors to come from Minneapolis. This would almost guarantee a prejudice. Another indication the trial was scripted. No real defense attorney would fail to object and file motions at this point. 8) Nelson's chief witness for the defense just happened to be a white guy from South Africa. Brilliant ploy by Nelson, right, calling up this pathologist from a famous apartheid state to defend Chauvin. In fact, this David Fowler already had a reputation as a racist coming in, since he was also involved in the case of Anton Black in 2018. This should tell you that, as usual, Chauvin was being prosecuted from both tables, proving once again the whole thing was staged. 9) In the video, we see that when the ambulance arrives, two guys in khaki bulletproof vests, khaki short sleeved shirts with brown pockets, and brown pants and caps get out of it rather than EMTs. This is a huge red flag and oversight by the directors. Those uniforms are state troopers, not Minneapolis police or EMT. Why would state troopers be getting out of an ambulance? State troopers are not EMTs: their job has to do with the roads and motorists. 10) There was a failure to sequester the jury, which should have caused a mistrial. 11) Despite failing to sequester, the fake judge issued a gag order on the trial. A gag order on a trial that is supposed to be fully televised? Make sense of that! 12) We are supposed to believe Chauvin was evil enough to choke Floyd to death while he begged for air, but not evil enough to confiscate the cellphone or camera of the person standing right in front of him, filming the whole thing? If you had just killed someone, either accidentally on purpose, would you happily allow someone to film it and then watch them walk away? 13) The films don't match. In the grainy film from behind, wide angle, where all four cops are on Floyd, we can see that no other people are filming or witnessing this at all. 14) In trial, prosecution admitted the time reported all over the world, nine minutes and change, wasn't even close to being accurate. They dropped it to four minutes and no one blinked an eye. 15) Chauvin was charged and convicted of three separate crimes for the same event: 2nd degree murder, 3rd degree murder, and 2nd degree manslaughter. That makes no sense. Only one man is allegedly dead, so you can't be charged for three murders or manslaughters there. The prosecution would be expected to pick one. It would be like stealing one car and being convicted of grand theft auto, petty theft, and conspiracy to commit theft. 16) As of today, April 21, Wikipedia still states: “Chauvin knelt on Floyd's neck for nine minutes and 29 seconds.[9] For part of the time, two other officers knelt on Floyd's back.[10] During the final two[11] minutes Floyd was motionless and had no pulse.” But they later admit that in trial, the nine minutes claim was dropped. And how could they know Floyd had no pulse during the final two minutes? Do we see anyone take his pulse? No. Do you think Chauvin took his pulse, found none, and then continued to kneel on him for two more minutes just for fun? They later created video of someone reaching in to check Floyd's pulse while Chauvin was still kneeling on him. Does that make any sense? The paramedics are going to arrive and check Floyd's pulse while Chauvin is still murdering him? Anyone who bought any of this needs serious help. 17) Chauvin posted a bond of $1 million. Where would a police officer get $1 million? 18) The prosecution was taken over from county attorney Michael Freeman by state Attorney General Keith Ellison. Ellison's participation was announced by Governor Tim Walz. Why were the Governor and Attorney General getting involved? They had no jurisdiction over this local crime. I have told you before why this is done: when the CIA runs an event, they don't like to work with locals, who may be honest. They demand to work with top officials, who they already own. 19) Ellison, half black and half Hispanic, allegedly converted from Catholicism to Islam. Indicating he is an Intelligence asset. The entire Nation of Islam project has always been a CIA front. Ellison had been involved with NoI back to 1989, defending Farrakhan against racism and antiSemitism. He later denied he had ever been a member. 20) Ellison had previously been involved in a very questionable event, when he spearheaded an ethics complaint against a fellow state representative for questioning specifics of the Holocaust. In other words, Ellison was promoting cancel culture back in 2004, against free speech. Fortunately, the House Ethics Committee failed to censure the man, ruling that a member had a right to speak, even when stating things that were offensive or even false. 21) Ellison failed to pay income taxes in five years between 1992 and 2000, and the IRS filed a lien on his home. Nonetheless he won a seat in the US House in 2006. He continued to get reprimanded and fined after 2000, for unreported campaign contributions, late filings, discrepancies in cash balances, and misclassified disbursements. Ironically, he was twice sued by the Minnesota AG at the time. 22) Ellison has survived multiple accusations of domestic abuse, from two girlfriends. Although the second one occurred in 2018, no one bowed to the now-required advice to always listen to the woman. 23) Minneapolis paid $27 million to Floyd's family before the criminal trial and even before the civil trial started. Again, it was a settlement to avoid trial, not a finding by a jury. We aren't told what the family was asking for in the suit, but $27 million is a huge amount to avoid a civil suit. They could not have hoped to cover up the case, since they knew the criminal trial would be a huge one. So, as usual, this makes no legal sense. We can only assume it was another theft from the treasury. 24) One of the witnesses against Chauvin was a professional MMA fighter, who just happened to witness the entire event. That's convenient, isn't it? Unfortunately, we don't see him in the films. 25) Another witness who just happened to be there was an EMT with the Minneapolis Fire Department. She had not been called to the scene, but was just walking by. What are the odds? She is also not in the films.
(post is archived)