yeh, the last bit is a prelude to a struggle session, but using the Bible as a cover.
They'd never mention that faggots were an abomination for instance, so it's cherry picking stuff that fits
"What are your experiences or observations of racism, as recipient or perpetrator, unintentional or otherwise"
"unintentional racism" is just code for: "we demand that all Wypipo apologise for their racism or we'll burn your culture down"
It's definitely cherry picking. Since I posted my comment I went and read more of the document. It's cherry picking all the way down. They do, in a limited capacity, call out the "jewish supremacy" and ethnic cleansing of non-jews aspect of the Old Testament. This is something, like homosexuality, that always gets glossed over by corporatized "Big Christianity".
But they assure as that:
As the NT church begins to mature and evolve it does so in a world where race relations between Jew and Gentile are a very real fact of life. A deep Biblical principle emerges: Jews do not cease to be Jews; Gentiles do not cease to be Gentiles.
Okay? A thinking man going down this rabbit hole isn't going to come to the conclusion that "gosh darnit, I should flagellate myself for having white skin and because some people with white skin participated in things that were socially acceptable hundreds/thousands of years ago but are now taboo." But instead, would think, "holy fucking shit, the religion was founded on the belief that the jews were magically superior to everyone else because GOD SAYS SO, and nowadays they are still self-isolating in communities all over the world and in Israel and fiercely protecting their borders while asking us to open ours." And then an a-ha moment regarding "muh Palestinians." Meanwhile, even the lowliest white trash honky will claim whites are superior because of engineering/science/etc. which are things that have actually happened that white people have accomplished. But from their earliest days, jews have acted like a fat chick spouting HAES and "you go girl" with nothing to back it up.
I feel like a homeless drunk who just saw an armored truck explode and send thousands of hundred dollar bills right in front of the liquor store. There are just so many shitty arguments to go after in the document that I could be here all day. I just don't know where to start and I don't want to spend my Saturday writing thousands of words on this bullshit. I feel like I could pick apart all of their bullshit with logical arguments, but we all know this shit isn't targeting people of sense, it's targeting emotions and you can't tell retards that they've been programmed to be retards.
it's targeting emotions
yep, it's the default 'Christian' argument now, "look at that dead baby on the beach, we must save all the brown ones!!!"
everyone: but why though?
If Christianity once formed the core values of our society then it's an obvious target for the Marxists as a pillar to dismantle, but they can't say "Christianity is bad because racism", because that drives away the Christians. but they can slowly reinterpret it to only support their point of view, and getting Christian groups to collude in this re-framing of their own religion is part of that process. When Christians start saying "We are bad because we don't love brown people as much as Jesus would have done", then the Marxists have won the culture war.
Christians are always going to be the weak link in the chain because it is based around everyone human being equal, but clearly Jesus never anticipated the effect of niggers on a society, that you could keep turning the cheek, you can keep giving them all your money and the nigger will keep taking advantage until it has absolute political power over your life. Reparations is not the end, it's the beginning.
At which point, wypipo all go in the cage but the Christians still won't admit they fucked up because their sky pixie will be along in a minute to save them.... Christianity is the same smooth-brain PsyOp as Q was
(post is archived)