WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.2K

I came across

I like many of you am sick of hearing about White privilege and systemic racism. However I feel this story is putting words in the Salvation Army's mouth. When looking for a source for this. The best I could find was a PDF training manual that posted.

I find it very shady the way Gateway Pundit allowed that article to be formatted.

It’s part of a push by the Christian charitable organization to embrace the ideas of Black Lives Matter, an activist group working to, among other things, “dismantle white privilege” and “disrupt the Western-prescribed nuclear family structure.”

The use of quotations here makes it appear that the Salivation Army said "dismantle white privilege” and “disrupt the Western-prescribed nuclear family structure.”, when in fact, those are the reporter's words.

This is the closest I could find on white privilege.

The subtle nature of racism is such that people who are not consciously racist easily function with the privileges, empowerment and benefits of the dominant ethnicity, thus unintentionally perpetuating injustice.

The word 'family' does not appear in the document one time.

While there are things to take issue with inside that document. That is not what this story does. It extrapolates to fit the reporter's objective. This is the same shit we take the MSM to task for.

Is there a reason Gateway Pundit wants us to shun the Salivation Army, destroy private charity so only government assistance remains? Is there a real reason to stop donating to them within that document? I'm not sure right now, but I find this article to be written in a way that is more propaganda than fact. You notice Jim Hoft doesn't even give a source for his comments.

If you look at the comments to this article on Gateway Pundit page and also on / you'll see the article is having the desired effect.

I came across [this story by the Gateway Pundit.](https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/11/salvation-army-wants-white-donors-offer-sincere-apology-racism/) I like many of you am sick of hearing about White privilege and systemic racism. However I feel this story is putting words in the Salvation Army's mouth. When looking for a source for this. The best I could find was a PDF training manual that @direwolf posted. [Here is the link.](https://s3.amazonaws.com/cache.salvationarmy.org/456ab604-ccb8-430e-af65-f75e04f223f5_Racism+Study+Guide.pdf) I find it very shady the way Gateway Pundit allowed that article to be formatted. >It’s part of a push by the Christian charitable organization to embrace the ideas of Black Lives Matter, an activist group working to, among other things, “dismantle white privilege” and “disrupt the Western-prescribed nuclear family structure.” The use of quotations here makes it appear that the Salivation Army said "dismantle white privilege” and “disrupt the Western-prescribed nuclear family structure.”, when in fact, those are the reporter's words. This is the closest I could find on white privilege. >The subtle nature of racism is such that people who are not consciously racist easily function with the privileges, empowerment and benefits of the dominant ethnicity, thus unintentionally perpetuating injustice. The word 'family' does not appear in the document one time. While there are things to take issue with inside that document. That is not what this story does. It extrapolates to fit the reporter's objective. This is the same shit we take the MSM to task for. Is there a reason Gateway Pundit wants us to shun the Salivation Army, destroy private charity so only government assistance remains? Is there a real reason to stop donating to them within that document? I'm not sure right now, but I find this article to be written in a way that is more propaganda than fact. You notice Jim Hoft doesn't even give a source for his comments. If you look at the comments to this article on Gateway Pundit page and also on [poal](https://poal.co/s/QStorm/471520) / [TheDonald](https://patriots.win/p/140JK7nOqM/many-are-boycotting-woke-salvati/c/) you'll see the article is having the desired effect.

(post is archived)

[–] 2 pts

Titus i warned about right wing shilling here already. Just because you agree with the propaganda don't mean it isn't propaganda. Poal has confirmed right wing shills too. I haven't got a leftist shill to admit it yet. The leftist might just be trolls

[–] 1 pt

Yes.

I'm trying to think back. I believe where we disagreed is my hesitancy to call out many as controlled opposition (which I do know exists).

It is very disheartening to see people on both side believe everything 'their' sources tell them without question. Perhaps I've fallen victim to that more than I know.

[–] 1 pt

Only trust Titus. Everyone else has their own agenda