Media owners aren't required to disclose if they stand to benefit on what they report.
They can show us all kinds of miserable news clips, then cut to a commercial---"Are you depressed? Ask your doctor if _______ is right for you!"---and they don't have to tell us they have stock in Big Pharma.
They can promote wars, and not tell us they are profiting. Wiki Genie Energy. Look who's on the advisory board. Then google genie energy syria. How ' bout them Golan Heights? Do you think Rupert might benefit if US troops were sent in?
Media owners aren't required to disclose if they stand to benefit on what they report.
They can show us all kinds of miserable news clips, then cut to a commercial---"Are you depressed? Ask your doctor if _______ is right for you!"---and they don't have to tell us they have stock in Big Pharma.
They can promote wars, and not tell us they are profiting. Wiki Genie Energy. Look who's on the advisory board. Then google genie energy syria. How ' bout them Golan Heights? Do you think Rupert might benefit if US troops were sent in?
They are required by law to list side effects, now that it is determined this was an advertisement all along, where are the fines?
They are required by law to list side effects, now that it is determined this was an advertisement all along, where are the fines?
(post is archived)