Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.3K

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/04/12/katie-bouman-the-29-year-old-woman-behind-first-ever-black-hole-image.html

Remember in 2019 when a jew urinalist propped up this nosey jew. These fucks reused the same exact picture and called it new. Thought we weren't gonna forget your big nosed meme girl.

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/04/12/katie-bouman-the-29-year-old-woman-behind-first-ever-black-hole-image.html Remember in 2019 when a jew urinalist propped up this nosey jew. These fucks reused the same exact picture and called it new. Thought we weren't gonna forget your big nosed meme girl.

(post is archived)

[–] [Sticky] • 3 pts
[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

If I recall correctly her contribution was doing some UI design.

[–] • 3 pts

Yeah. She wasn't even directly involved with the code that was crunching the data.

But because she's a female and especially a kikess, she most certainly cucked the male goyim team into submission to let her collect the fruits of their hard work and brag about it in a TED talk.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

We don't even know whether it's a black hole or another very dense object, like a quark star.

[–] • 1 pt

Astronomers believe nearly all galaxies, including our own, have these giant black holes at their bustling and crowded center, where light and matter cannot escape, making it extremely hard to get images of them

Reminds me of that supposed video of the north pole, which depicts a giant black hole that's on fire

[–] • 1 pt

Theorized by a guy who spoke like a retard and "communicated" by having a "neurolink" computer hooked to up to his brain in order to "speak for him"

[–] • 0 pt

Wtf are you talking about

[–] • 0 pt

Stephen Hawking...

[–] • 1 pt

well its all a fake image, as there is nothing visible to see. its a mathematical guess of what might be seen biased off the radiation and radio waves we are received that was sent like 10,000 years ago

[–] • 0 pt

The farthest that Hubble has seen so far is about 10-15 billion light-years away.

1 lightyear = 9.5 trillion km

9.5 trillion x 10 billion = 9.5e+22 km

Seems legit, why would you even dare question the science behind this!

[–] • 0 pt

Its not fake. -1 for you!

[–] • 2 pts

It's not a real picture, per se, but a computer generated image based on data collected (moving stars and their trajectories) over the years.

[–] • 1 pt

Yes a picture based on interferometry. Still a resolved picture. OP called it fake, which it clearly isnt.

[–] • 2 pts

I wouldn't call it fake too, but it technically isn't a "real" picture either.

[–] • 2 pts

It's fake in the sense that they're rehashing a CGI image and calling it new. -1 to represent the non resonance in our resoning.

[–] • 0 pt

It is a new image of a new part of the sky that was not imaged before to this resolution. It's not a rehash of an older or existing CGI image.

[–] • 0 pt

Yes it is. It's exactly the same image from 2019 with more jpg blurriness.