Its not fake. -1 for you!
Its not fake. -1 for you!
It's not a real picture, per se, but a computer generated image based on data collected (moving stars and their trajectories) over the years.
It's not a real picture, per se, but a computer generated image based on data collected (moving stars and their trajectories) over the years.
Yes a picture based on interferometry. Still a resolved picture. OP called it fake, which it clearly isnt.
Yes a picture based on interferometry. Still a resolved picture. OP called it fake, which it clearly isnt.
I wouldn't call it fake too, but it technically isn't a "real" picture either.
I wouldn't call it fake too, but it technically isn't a "real" picture either.
It's fake in the sense that they're rehashing a CGI image and calling it new. -1 to represent the non resonance in our resoning.
It's fake in the sense that they're rehashing a CGI image and calling it new. -1 to represent the non resonance in our resoning.
It is a new image of a new part of the sky that was not imaged before to this resolution. It's not a rehash of an older or existing CGI image.
It is a new image of a new part of the sky that was not imaged before to this resolution. It's not a rehash of an older or existing CGI image.
Yes it is. It's exactly the same image from 2019 with more jpg blurriness.
Yes it is. It's exactly the same image from 2019 with more jpg blurriness.
(post is archived)