Clearly that interviewer is more interested in reinforcing a narrative than getting answers to his questions.
- Calling the incident on Jan 6 a "riot" that injured "dozens of police"
- Falsely claiming there is "no evidence" of fraudulent elections, and anyone who wants transparency wants to "overturn" the election.
- Linking election transparency to "quanon conspiracy theories" about human trafficking.
The desperation of this interviewer to push the notion that 2020 was the most perfect election ever that was absolutely not corrupt is enough to prove to me that the opposite is true.
Clearly that interviewer is more interested in reinforcing a narrative than getting answers to his questions.
1. Calling the incident on Jan 6 a "riot" that injured "dozens of police"
2. Falsely claiming there is "no evidence" of fraudulent elections, and anyone who wants transparency wants to "overturn" the election.
3. Linking election transparency to "quanon conspiracy theories" about human trafficking.
The desperation of this interviewer to push the notion that 2020 was the most perfect election ever that was absolutely not corrupt is enough to prove to me that the opposite is true.
(post is archived)