Not necessarily, and for a ton of reasons
When a crypto currency isn't considered legal tender by law, or even banned, what are you going to do with it? If you can't pay your taxes or buy something with it, what are you going to do?
Now you can have the official crypto, fedcoin, ccpcoin... No bankrun problem... But for the control part, well... I'm not going to hold my breath
Besides, the latest bitcoin episode isn't exactly good press for crypto https://pic8.co/sh/gXHfKz.png
Needless to mention the other scandals such as mtgox and vanishing coins, the average man is tech dumb, of course he isn't going to set up his own shit
And for new cryptos... Well they can easily get cornered/taken over by big players, so you potentially face a world of hurt ultimately with those
...
IMO, all this shit is trending toward govcoin
True it can't be a 100% switch until you can use it to pay taxes, but you can start to use it now in place of bartering. Regardless, the more people are pushed into a corner the more they will re-evaluate their priorities. Banned or not, crypto currency provides an option to protect some of your worth from tyrannical control...there will be a threshold at which each person will say "it's worth giving it a try".
The BTC/USD price is still volatile, yes, so there is an added layer of risk if BTC is used for payment of things that are priced in USD. The entire market is down right now, even though BTC is down more, because of the recession we're now in. BTC also goes higher than the market during the growth period. Regardless, this entire layer can be bypassed for now by keeping your money in several stable coins that are pegged to the price of USD. Then you can convert it to another cryptocurrency as you buy something, and the price of that currency at that moment won't matter...since everyone would still be pricing in USD.
Needless to mention the other scandals such as mtgox and vanishing coins...
What's the difference between a vanishing coin and a permanently frozen deposit?
...average man is tech dumb
This, for good or bad, will be the next test of "survival of the fittest". Those that take the time to learn this tech will survive the next phase, the others will remain trapped like a slave. But even this is on a gradient scale: you don't need to be a crypto developer to pay for your McDonald's meal in BTC using your phone.
What's the difference between a vanishing coin and a permanently frozen deposit?
Nothing says it's going to be permanent, and a bankrun is only a problem with bills/cash, not with digits... Hence why they're going to move to a govcoin, how convenient...
Vanished coins are vanished, there's no way to get them back, it's as if they never existed, it's not like you can sue an entity here, it's gone, poof
This, for good or bad, will be the next test of "survival of the fittest". Those that take the time to learn this tech will survive the next phase, the others will remain trapped like a slave. But even this is on a gradient scale: you don't need to be a crypto developer to pay for your McDonald's meal in BTC using your phone.
I don't believe this one bit, anything can be confiscated and/or criminalized, starting wiht gold ownership for instance, bitcoin is no different, there's no safe haven
There's currently no set date for unfreezing the deposits either, so it's still a risk. Ignoring for a moment that it could take days or months to get the funds back, the fact that access to the funds have been taken away simply because of a violation of trust is the larger concern here. China's social credit score system that also interferes with your fund access is another example.
Vanished coins are vanished, there's no way to get them back, it's as if they never existed, it's not like you can sue an entity here, it's gone, poof
Are you using "vanish" to mean stolen? ERC-20 coins on the Etherium chain (or side chain) don't just disappear unless they are authorized by the coin holder to be burned by the underlying contract script, and even then this is specific to the coin's design and is controlled not random. If you are referring to theft by a crypto exchange company, meaning funds in their wallet that were allocated to you are no longer accessible, then there is an entity to sue.
anything can be confiscated and/or criminalized, starting wiht gold ownership for instance, bitcoin is no different, there's no safe haven
right, and from this context you can properly deal with the question "what ways can I protect my wealth and freedom from being taken away by others?"
Whether it's cash under the mattress, your house, farm animals, a digital record in a central bank or exchange, or a digital record in a globally distributed blockchain, you have to recognize there are pros and cons to each of these forms. If you only look at this one risk of cryptocurrency and ignore everything else, then you're cheating yourself of the larger view point when considering how to protect your wealth.
(post is archived)