WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

635

Voat seems to have gained a large percentage of idiots in the past several months or over the past year. One guy tried to prove his intelligence by asking me about the binomial theorem, which I learned in 8th grade algebra. I don't expect everyone to be expert in math, but one should have some sense of one's expertise, and not be a walking embodiment of Dunning-Kruger idiocy.

A year or so ago, if I made a reasonable comment, I'd generally get an up vote. There was effectively a group mind that tended to give comments an aggregate of 1 or 0 votes. (Uncorrelated, non-group mind votes would, statistically, be more dispersed.) Now, a great many comments are left at zero.

Neither of these is that extreme, but over time, they leave me with a sense of "Why bother?"

Voat seems to have gained a large percentage of idiots in the past several months or over the past year. One guy tried to prove his intelligence by asking me about the binomial theorem, which I learned in 8th grade algebra. I don't expect everyone to be expert in math, but one should have some sense of one's expertise, and not be a walking embodiment of Dunning-Kruger idiocy. A year or so ago, if I made a reasonable comment, I'd generally get an up vote. There was effectively a group mind that tended to give comments an aggregate of 1 or 0 votes. (Uncorrelated, non-group mind votes would, statistically, be more dispersed.) Now, a great many comments are left at zero. Neither of these is that extreme, but over time, they leave me with a sense of "Why bother?"

(post is archived)

[–] 3 pts (edited )

IMO up and down votes on any social platform are pointless -- no pun intended -- at best and wildly misleading at worst. The value they are supposed to provide -- namely to make 'better' comments more visible while sending the 'bad' comments to oblivion -- quickly becomes over ridden by glory hogging and agenda pushing. I rarely upvote any more, and only downvote when the comment is seriously off point or a clear attempt to derail the discussion and even here it's mostly out of spite rather than because I feel I'm providing some useful contribution.

I feel that if you want to see quality content then you need to put in the time wading through the junk; there is no short cut.

OP's sentiment "Why bother?" is bang on, but sadly so is "Don't bother".

On that note some -- ie. very few -- comments are interesting or funny and I can get a lot out of reading them, so for me at least it's worth my time to scroll through. But it's a crap shoot and mostly a huge waste of time, not to mention always take anything you read with a very large grain of salt. My grandpa used to tell great stories but even as a small child I understood that the real value was in his qualities as a story teller rather than in what had actually happened.