WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

They were either way.

They were either way.

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

https://pic8.co/sh/Huz4G8.png

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swedish_slave_trade

>The Swedish slave trade mainly occurred in the early history of Sweden when the trade of thralls (Old Norse: þræll) was one of the pillars of the Norse economy. During the raids, the Vikings often captured and enslaved militarily weaker peoples they encountered, but took the most slaves in raids of the British Isles, and Slavs in Eastern Europe. This practice lasted from the 6th through 11th centuries until formally abolished in 1335. A smaller trade of African slaves happened during the 17th and 18th centuries,[1] around the time Swedish overseas colonies were established in North America (1638) and in Africa (1650). It remained legal until 1813.

...

Oh the irony...

[–] 0 pt

I can guarantee to you that they weren't taking any slaves from my country, nor were we militarily weaker. If they were taking slaves frome weaker enemies I don't care, the weak must be culled.

Such were the times back then, European infighting in the history is what made us strong and competent warriors, which is something we will need to call upon soon.

Also that was not very turn the other cheek from you, I will report you to pope.

[–] 0 pt

Oh, you can guarantee that?

You can't... First you weren't there. Second, you weren't aware vikings enslaved slavs to begin with, until I mentioned it here, obviously

[–] 0 pt

I was, and yes I can guaranteed that they weren't taking slaves from my country 110%.

[–] 0 pt

Shame they never actually did any fighting against muslims, or negros or jews.