WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

They were either way.

They were either way.

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

I can guarantee to you that they weren't taking any slaves from my country, nor were we militarily weaker. If they were taking slaves frome weaker enemies I don't care, the weak must be culled.

Such were the times back then, European infighting in the history is what made us strong and competent warriors, which is something we will need to call upon soon.

Also that was not very turn the other cheek from you, I will report you to pope.

[–] 0 pt

Oh, you can guarantee that?

You can't... First you weren't there. Second, you weren't aware vikings enslaved slavs to begin with, until I mentioned it here, obviously

[–] 0 pt

I was, and yes I can guaranteed that they weren't taking slaves from my country 110%.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

Oh you were there, of course... /s

And since of course you won't tell what your country is, we'll never know, alright, circular shit...

So according to you, the abuse is justified in the name of darwin essentially, the strong is always right/might is right etc, correct?

Well then I guess it just validates kikes, they have the upper hand, they abuse their position of power, obviously, and that's fine according to your logic so... No? Why not?

Oh, let me guess... Because they aren't fighting us like "real men", with their fist, swords, and guns, right?

Well year it's 2023, tech is a bitch, and so are financial and economic warfare - "but they cheated!"

...

Edit:

"Look they murdered monks, so tough, so brave..." Fucking retarded murderers, the whole lot of them

And where are they now, the viking tough guys?