Polling was very close to if not a science. Now science itself is showing signs of being bought and paid for by political interests making it difficult to believe certain things. Im not saying they cant be off or miss things but not by the margins that they did. I would have to see some hard evidence that it was not an organized effort to swing votes. Since that I ignore all polls even the positive ones for me. They lost any credibility from me that I had before 2016. Bought and paid for. The New York Times is a professional propaganda machine anyway so theres that too.
Polling was very close to if not a science. Now science itself is showing signs of being bought and paid for by political interests making it difficult to believe certain things. Im not saying they cant be off or miss things but not by the margins that they did. I would have to see some hard evidence that it was not an organized effort to swing votes. Since that I ignore all polls even the positive ones for me. They lost any credibility from me that I had before 2016. Bought and paid for. The New York Times is a professional propaganda machine anyway so theres that too.
(post is archived)