As the jury deliberates over whether the undercover videos are considered “private” or “confidential,” and therefore illegal under state law, the defense is barred from showing videos that could prove whether the videos were recorded in private settings. ___________________________________________________________________________________ Recorded in private setting? Irrelevant .. they still are admissible. unless objectionable of other grounds. So the defense's argument that they should be barred is correctly refused by the court. When I see this, I assume that the author is an idiot. And his writings are not to be trusted.