I've heard that the anti-trust action taken against microsoft was to force them to include back door access into windows.
I've heard that the anti-trust action taken against microsoft was to force them to include back door access into windows.
Probably that too. The famous "NSA key" was discovered in windows around that time. Come to think of it, I wonder if the cream pie incident was staged by deep staters to emotionally pressure gates. The suit against microsoft was a joke. If they seriously wanted to go after them they'd attack them for the practice of making deals with manufacturers to suppress competing operating systems, not because he went into competition with netscape.
Bottom line, "anti-trust" has nothing to do with ending monopolies, only enforcing them. It's in the interest of governments to support monopolies, not break them up.
Probably that too. The famous "NSA key" was discovered in windows around that time. Come to think of it, I wonder if the cream pie incident was staged by deep staters to emotionally pressure gates. The suit against microsoft was a joke. If they seriously wanted to go after them they'd attack them for the practice of making deals with manufacturers to suppress competing operating systems, not because he went into competition with netscape.
Bottom line, "anti-trust" has nothing to do with ending monopolies, only enforcing them. It's in the interest of governments to support monopolies, not break them up.
(post is archived)