Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.2K

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] • 17 pts

It's almost like the anthropological study of bones is a real science and not everyone is the same.

[–] • 13 pts

"These are different sub-species of birds based upon the bone structure". Nobody bats an eye.

"These are different sub-species of humans based upon the bone structure". Everyone loses their minds.

[–] • 6 pts

It's as simple as this:

"Do you think Darwin's theory of evolution, the most robust theory to date, is correct?"

Of course they have to say yes.

"Then why doesn't it apply to humans?"

[–] • 2 pts

Or dogs.

Fact is in a million years an intelligent species will dig up human and canus bones and classify both as a genus.

[–] • 2 pts

Dat raycisss!!1!!

[–] • 0 pt

Not everyone, just the loud and stupid.

[–] • 2 pts

Now that's just exhaustively peer-reviewed crazy talk.

[–] • 7 pts

Good AI always names the Jew

[–] • 5 pts

People can recognize race pretty consistently as well, when they are not brainwashed by liberal lies not to do so.

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

Here it's done from low res images of bone structure.

[–] • 5 pts

Why do they consider this a problem?

[–] [deleted] • 6 pts (edited )

From the linked paper:

We emphasize that model ability to predict self-reported race is itself not the issue of importance. However, our findings that AI can trivially predict self-reported race -- even from corrupted, cropped, and noised medical images -- in a setting where clinical experts cannot, creates an enormous risk for all model deployments in medical imaging: if an AI model secretly used its knowledge of self-reported race to misclassify all Black patients, radiologists would not be able to tell using the same data the model has access to.

In other words, "AI could be racist and we wouldn't know it". It makes sense only to the brain damaged.

He's not concerned that the AI might make a mistake as much as the AI's mistakes being correlated to race.

[–] • 3 pts

AI: "You have cancer in your lower left lung... nigger."

Liberal: Well now I won't treat it!

[–] • 1 pt

>We emphasize that model ability to predict self-reported race is itself not the issue of importance. However, our findings that AI can trivially predict self-reported race -- even from corrupted, cropped, and noised medical images -- in a setting where clinical experts cannot, creates an enormous risk for all model deployments in medical imaging: if an AI model secretly used its knowledge of self-reported race to misclassify all Black patients, radiologists would not be able to tell using the same data the model has access to.

Secretly used its knowledge... Like how? Guessing based on patient's name? As in shaniqua renae?

[–] [deleted] • 3 pts (edited )

He's saying that since the AI "knows" the race, it might do something with that knowledge and act on it. The AI could diagnose better or worse based on race by the mere fact that race is one of the factors that it "knows".

Patient's names aren't given to the AI for this very reason.

To play a devil's advocate, let's say the AI is trained on black patients and white patients. In its training data the black patients happened to all be sick, and the white patients happened to all be healthy. Instead of learning to diagnose whatever condition it's being trained to diagnose, it finds a different correlation: race. So when it gets fed an x-ray, instead of actual diagnoses it bases its guess on race alone.

A less extreme example would be training AI to detect STDs. Black have very high rates of STDs compared to whites. So if it "diagnoses" whether a person has an STD solely based on race it would be making pretty accurate guesses--much better than chance.

[–] • 1 pt

if an AI model secretly used its knowledge of self-reported race to misclassify all Black patients, radiologists would not be able to tell using the same data the model has access to.

They might be able to tell when all the niggers with broken bones were ruled "healthy" by the AI. God damn, why are liberal faggots so stupid?

[–] • 0 pt

If anything if the AI is rewarded for good patient outcomes it is likely to use its knowledge to account for racial differences and treat patients BETTER.

[–] • 2 pts

We can tell how long science has been subverted by the fact that homo sapians wasn't classified a genus.

Which it clearly fuking is

[–] • 0 pt

Oh I'd love to be a researcher and unleash this kind of thing on other data, e.g. spending, arrests, writing style, etc. I bet it would recognize niggers every time, no matter what data of their behavior you fed it.

[–] • -1 pt

Which race(s)? Aryan from negroid, Jews from Hindus? Does not say. Sounds useless.