WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

396

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] 3 pts (edited )

He's saying that since the AI "knows" the race, it might do something with that knowledge and act on it. The AI could diagnose better or worse based on race by the mere fact that race is one of the factors that it "knows".

Patient's names aren't given to the AI for this very reason.

To play a devil's advocate, let's say the AI is trained on black patients and white patients. In its training data the black patients happened to all be sick, and the white patients happened to all be healthy. Instead of learning to diagnose whatever condition it's being trained to diagnose, it finds a different correlation: race. So when it gets fed an x-ray, instead of actual diagnoses it bases its guess on race alone.

A less extreme example would be training AI to detect STDs. Black have very high rates of STDs compared to whites. So if it "diagnoses" whether a person has an STD solely based on race it would be making pretty accurate guesses--much better than chance.

[–] 0 pt

>He's saying that since the AI "knows" the race, it might do something with that knowledge and act on it.

>Patient's names aren't given to the AI for this very reason.

So, why give the patient's race to the AI then?