Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

841

Microsoft has a framework called WPF. Whilst nice in some ways, it isn't portable, has tons of bugs, and insane, over the top architecture, and tons of issues which were never fixed. Whilst it can do a lot, a lot of the design decisions leave a lot in terms of questions. For example, why do tree views not have context to their parents? Why are dependency properties so retarded?

After a while, i looked into the world of GTK. Wasn't a fan. And QT came into the picture. Now, outside of not knowing jack about the framework, I somehow become more productive in C++ and QT than i did in WPF. Sure, the app wont have the look and feel polish, but it can run everywhere, it has tons of libraries, and its pretty fast. It also leaves you with tons of casting options out of the box, which makes IO super convenient.

Overall, I'm done with Microsoft, however look out for my new side project being released later on this month

Microsoft has a framework called WPF. Whilst nice in some ways, it isn't portable, has tons of bugs, and insane, over the top architecture, and tons of issues which were never fixed. Whilst it can do a lot, a lot of the design decisions leave a lot in terms of questions. For example, why do tree views not have context to their parents? Why are dependency properties so retarded? After a while, i looked into the world of GTK. Wasn't a fan. And QT came into the picture. Now, outside of not knowing jack about the framework, I somehow become more productive in C++ and QT than i did in WPF. Sure, the app wont have the look and feel polish, but it can run everywhere, it has tons of libraries, and its pretty fast. It also leaves you with tons of casting options out of the box, which makes IO super convenient. Overall, I'm done with Microsoft, however look out for my new side project being released later on this month

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (25).
[–] • 0 pt

C++ sucks balls.

Say what you like about Ms but c# is the best fully fledged language by far.

C++ devs spend far more time debugging and less time producing code

[–] • 1 pt

Or maybe you know, you suck massive nigger faggot dick

[–] • 0 pt

Glad to upset an c++ apologist.

Such a shiity language that produces buggy expensive apps.

C++ is obsolete

[–] • 1 pt

I cAn'T wRiTe cPluZPluZ bCuZ iZ tOo HaRd lol

Yes, seven-hundred and ninety-three point nine seven motherfucking terabytes of CLR (*) is worth it. That's the answer.

Yes.

Clearly.

(*) This number is hyperbole. Don't be a nigger about it.

[–] • 2 pts

as someone who tried calculating the black hole of the CLR, still debating whether .NET CLR or NodeJS suck more dick

[–] • 0 pt

C# isn't easily portable. Java and C++ are.

[–] • 0 pt

Garbage. For starters Java is a dying pig of a language.

But fact is dotnet mvc core is extremely portable.

Actually if portable is the main desire build any web app. Far superior to crappy other apps.

[–] • 0 pt

Out of the top 25 websites in the world, only 2 aren't using Linux. 96.3% of the world's top 1 million servers run on Linux