Doesn't that make them publishers? A violation of section 230? Or did I miss something here.
Doesn't that make them publishers? A violation of section 230? Or did I miss something here.
Perhaps but section 230 only provides immunity (my understanding, IANAL). Someone still has to prosecute/sue them for something. And someone is suing them is how this statement came about.
In practice the government lets Big Tech do whatever they want, and lawsuits have not been succeeding.
Perhaps but section 230 only provides immunity (my understanding, IANAL). Someone still has to prosecute/sue them for something. And someone is suing them is how this statement came about.
In practice the government lets Big Tech do whatever they want, and lawsuits have not been succeeding.
I think by now 230 just means "we can't be prosecuted for anything we do"
I think by now 230 just means "we can't be prosecuted for anything we do"
Facebook is run by (((cat lovers)))
Facebook is run by (((cat lovers)))
(post is archived)